Teams

BC-ErnieHowlett/TakTakeda

2026 MIXED 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-22vs BC-MCC/MikeYogiLost 02
L#2 DoublesHaruka Yoshikawa / Harry Kushigemachi vs Aimee Gallego-Cochran / John J Cochran4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRiho Nakano / HAYATO NISHIGUCHI vs Denise Coit / Brian Kelleher4-6, 2-3
2026-02-28vs BC-WestEnd/JoseUribeLost 12
W#1 DoublesChiaki Maeda / Kanata Yamayoshi vs Martina Ricabar / Jose Uribe6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYukiko Hawley / HAYATO NISHIGUCHI vs Warunee Facter / Martin Chi4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJunko Kuroda / Mitsuru Tasato vs Angelica Galvez-Deutsch / Andrew Brewster2-6, 1-6
2026-02-21vs BC-MCC/VeronicaDeutschLost 01
L#2 DoublesSayaka Hur / Keiichi Yamada vs Siobhan Carroll / Steven Anderson4-6, 4-6
2026-01-24vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/AndreaTorngLost 02
L#1 DoublesRiho Nakano / Kanata Yamayoshi vs Michelle Wun / Eli Alejo2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChiaki Maeda / HAYATO NISHIGUCHI vs Emma Hanson / David Lam2-6, 0-6
2026-01-18vs BC-AltaVista/ElaineChanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJumpei Yoshikawa / Yukiko Hawley vs Tracy Costantino / Jonathan Liang6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSayaka Hur / Mitsuru Tasato vs Emily Marmol / Hanfei Sun4-6, 3-6
2026-01-10vs BC-AltaVista/JinWenLost 02
L#1 DoublesYukiko Hawley / HAYATO NISHIGUCHI vs Anne Pila / James Noh4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJunko Kuroda / Keiichi Yamada vs Yoko Ishizuka / Kangsung Yip4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-AltaVista/ElaineChan43111021191
2BC-MCC/MikeYogi34111023200
3BC-AltaVista/JinWen3491228210
4BC-ErnieHowlett/TakTakeda1651633211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Junko Kuroda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Sayaka Hur
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Kanata Yamayoshi
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.94
Chiaki Maeda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
HAYATO NISHIGUCHI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Yukiko Hawley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Aki Takeda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Riho Nakano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Tak Takeda
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Junichi Yamayoshi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.32
Mitsuru Tasato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Harry Kushigemachi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Haruka Yoshikawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jumpei Yoshikawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Keiichi Yamada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riho Nakano + Junichi Yamayoshi1435% gamesnot enough data
Tak Takeda + Riho Nakano224 matchesnot enough data
Junko Kuroda + Keiichi Yamada224 matchesnot enough data
HAYATO NISHIGUCHI + Yukiko Hawley044 matchesnot enough data
Sayaka Hur + Keiichi Yamada044 matchesnot enough data
Harry Kushigemachi + Junko Kuroda123 matchesnot enough data
Harry Kushigemachi + Sayaka Hur123 matchesnot enough data
HAYATO NISHIGUCHI + Chiaki Maeda033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Kuroda
117W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Sayaka Hur
75W–124L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Kanata Yamayoshi
14W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Chiaki Maeda
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
HAYATO NISHIGUCHI
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Yukiko Hawley
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Aki Takeda
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Riho Nakano
92W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Tak Takeda
66W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Junichi Yamayoshi
53W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Mitsuru Tasato
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Harry Kushigemachi
10W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Haruka Yoshikawa
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jumpei Yoshikawa
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Keiichi Yamada
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.