Teams

CROW CANYON CC 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-02Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Carmassi / Shelley Lober vs Fang Lin / Eric Zhong2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDean Christman / Stephanie Chamberlin vs Lisa Saporito / Loay Morsy2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDebbie Baker / Steve Heninger vs Benjamin Cha / Ruby Sioson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-12vs NorCal/Chan/55&Over7.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelley Lober / Dean Christman vs Dongjie Fan / Don Scettrini5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Chamberlin / Gary Peer vs Janet Lum / Loay Morsy1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Gerhart / Perry Teevens vs Lisa Saporito / Patrick Chan2-6, 3-6
2025-09-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Heninger / Debbie Baker vs Dan Gullion / Melissa Bach1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Baker / Steve Heninger vs Larry Namekata / Lek Taylor6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Dennis Mcsweeney
published 4
3.40
Stephanie Chamberlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Shelley Lober
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jill Pfeiffer
published
3.30
Steve Heninger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Dean Christman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Lea McSweeney
published
3.20
Steve Carmassi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.07
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.91
Perry Teevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Peer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Sharkey
published
Kathleen Gerhart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Pratt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dennis Mcsweeney
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jill Pfeiffer
44W–42L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Steve Heninger
52W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dean Christman
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Lea McSweeney
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Steve Carmassi
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Perry Teevens
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Gary Peer
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Sharkey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Gerhart
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Pratt
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.