Teams

BTA-C RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs NJ REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristy Valentine / Veronica Johnston vs STACEY OELTJENBRUNS / Jennifer Lyons4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Gaud vs Kira Moore3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Watson / Kristi Gray vs Kris Hansen / Lydia Pistol7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMandy Jasper / Ruth Henderson vs Laura Larkins / Holly Bristol6-4, 7-6
2026-07-09vs LTA-Q NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Christy Valentine vs Sarah Downey / Tsugumi Richards5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Linda Vigil7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristi Gray / Emily Gaud vs Catherine Bryan / Carmel Gill6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Byther / Katherine Dierking vs Karen Dauer / Stephanie Ohlsen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-02vs BTA-C GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Killion / Veronica Johnston vs Ardith Falkner / Payal Sathe4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Byther / Katherine Dierking vs Rebekah Davis / Charry Morris2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Henderson / Kristi Gray vs Kate Resnick / Alia Ghandour6-3, 6-4
2026-06-26vs MEA GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLindsey Killion / Emily Gaud vs Leslie Allen / Hilary Talocco6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Jennifer Mitchell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Watson / Christy Valentine vs Kara McDowell / Amy Carpenter6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Byther / Katherine Dierking vs Tamara Harvey / Julie von Eschen7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-18vs CVTA REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristy Valentine / Emily Gaud vs Colleen Weaverling / Sarah Abernathey7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMandy Jasper vs Meredith Trowbridge6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRuth Henderson / Katherine Dierking vs Beth Spangler / Alicia Hillen6-3, 6-3
2026-06-11vs NJ REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesStephanie Watson / Christy Valentine vs Tara Hammar / Jennifer Lyons5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLindsey Killion vs Kira Moore6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVeronica Johnston / Emily Gaud vs Erin Manzolillo / STACEY OELTJENBRUNS4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRuth Henderson / Lisa Byther vs Renee Richker / Lydia Pistol6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs LTA-Q NAVYLost 13
W#1 DoublesMandy Jasper / Veronica Johnston vs Claire Simon / Stephanie Ohlsen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLindsey Killion vs Carmel Gill4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Watson / Emily Gaud vs Sarah Downey / Lakshmi Vegesna5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristi Gray / JORDAN KAAR vs Catherine Bryan / Irina Schwarzburg4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kristi Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Mandy Jasper
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Lindsey Killion
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Veronica Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Emily Gaud
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Christy Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Stephanie Watson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Lisa Byther
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Katherine Dierking
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Ruth Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
JORDAN KAAR
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Watson + Lindsey Killion7261% games+10.6% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Mandy Jasper5749% games+2.6% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Katherine Dierking4251% games+1.5% vs expected
Veronica Johnston + Christy Valentine3848% games+0.6% vs expected
Kristi Gray + Ruth Henderson6649% games+0.1% vs expected
Mandy Jasper + Veronica Johnston3450% games−0.3% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Ruth Henderson3242% games−0.8% vs expected
Stephanie Watson + Kristi Gray171452% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Gray
62W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Mandy Jasper
60W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Lindsey Killion
67W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Veronica Johnston
49W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Emily Gaud
34W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Christy Valentine
45W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Stephanie Watson
53W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Byther
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Katherine Dierking
58W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
3
Ruth Henderson
70W–114L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
3
JORDAN KAAR
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.