Teams

RTC MERKLIN

2025 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Men 40 Winter · 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-15vs RTC PATTONWon 31
L#1 DoublesDoug French / Ryan Rich vs Robert Thornton / Paul Larmon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBo Moseley vs Michael Rea6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Lewis / Cory Thomas vs Matthew Massey / Stephen Jacob6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBill Stetzer / Mike Fincher vs Bruce Patton / John Borley6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Cory Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Mike Fincher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Bill Stetzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Ryan Rich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
John Neill
published
3.33
Safwan Hallab
published
3.28
Doug French
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Mark Mayer
published
Armando Reyes
published 3.5
3.18
Bo Moseley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
2.98
Troy Merklin
published
Michael Lewis
published
Tom Rockwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug French + Safwan Hallab7553% games+1.0% vs expected
Ryan Rich + Safwan Hallab4448% games−3.5% vs expected
Bill Stetzer + Mike Fincher4549% games−4.3% vs expected
Mark Mayer + John Neill224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Rich + Cory Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cory Thomas
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
Mike Fincher
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Bill Stetzer
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
Ryan Rich
33W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
John Neill
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
Safwan Hallab
33W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Doug French
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Mark Mayer
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Armando Reyes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bo Moseley
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Rajasekhar Jagarlamudi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Troy Merklin
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Michael Lewis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Rockwell
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.