Teams

WW-Coleman

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-18vs BURK-DeckerLost 01
L#3 DoublesHarry Turton / Sarah Oatts vs Adam Decker / Bridget Cease7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-05vs WW-KellyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Nathan Lord vs Leslie Altaffer / Gil Elmaleh2-6, 2-6
2023-03-04vs ACAC-StephensLost 01
L#1 DoublesHarry Turton / Sarah Oatts vs Adam Plotkin / Rebecca Wong3-6, 5-7
2023-02-25vs BURK-KampingaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Kirk Evans vs Sam McKelvey / Jane Colgin6-4, 6-1
2023-02-19vs SAL-FranksLost 01
L#3 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Nathan Lord vs Caroline Andrews / Drew Lineberger4-6, 2-6
2023-01-29vs WO-FordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Michael Baxter vs Julia Calamita / Paul Calamita7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKirk Evans / Sarah Oatts vs Chad Anderson / Lucia O'Connell6-1, 6-3
2023-01-08vs RAIN-RaghavanLost 01
L#1 DoublesDutch Jones / Sarah Oatts vs Lorraine McGehee / Luis Rodriguez-Miranda6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Carter King
published 4.5
4.18
Michael Baxter
published
3.93
Sarah Oatts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Kimberly Varney
published
3.67
Lauren Jones
published
3.62
Dutch Jones
published 4
3.55
Walker Reid
published
3.51
Ashley Wright Henry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Nathan Lord
published
3.43
Meagan Mihalko
published
3.26
Harry Turton
published 3.5
3.25
Frank Payne
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Dutch Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carter King
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.21
Michael Baxter
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
4.18
4
Sarah Oatts
81W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
Kimberly Varney
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Jones
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Dutch Jones
14W–16L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Walker Reid
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Ashley Wright Henry
47W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Nathan Lord
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Meagan Mihalko
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Harry Turton
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Frank Payne
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.