Teams

LANEY TA/Encinal HS CW5.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 5.5

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-03vs CHABOT CANYON CW5.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesMELISSA de CASTRO / Michelle Watkins vs Diane Heinze / Grace Kim7-5, 6-2
2024-10-26vs CLAREMONT R and S CW5.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Fong / Michelle Watkins vs Denise Yamamoto / Anne Wheeler6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK CW5.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Bowe / Michelle Watkins vs Jessica Jang / Tenzin Tsering6-1, 6-2
2024-09-22vs CHABOT CANYON CW5.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeann Kanowsky / Michelle Watkins vs Emily Brod / Brooke Moller6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Lauren Fong
published
3.06
Anna Bowe
published 3
2.96
MELISSA de CASTRO
published
2.93
Alexandra Mendoza
published 2.5
2.87
JoAnn Mar
published
2.86
2.83
Serena Zanello
published
Michelle Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Cynthia Lim
published 3
2.63
Leann Kanowsky
published
2.54
Katherine Greenberg
published
2.48
Olivia Mattox
published
2.44
2.43
Ginny Mayer
published 3
2.34
Deborah Hullings-Le
published 2.5
2.20
Diana Cin
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginny Mayer + Deborah Hullings-Le2332% gamesnot enough data
Olivia Mattox + Katherine Greenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Fong
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Anna Bowe
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
MELISSA de CASTRO
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.96
2.5
Alexandra Mendoza
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
2.93
JoAnn Mar
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.87
3
Alexandra Seibert
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
Serena Zanello
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Michelle Watkins
50W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Cynthia Lim
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
Leann Kanowsky
15W–31L career · no lines in 2024
0%15%85%
2.63
Katherine Greenberg
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Olivia Mattox
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%58%42%
2.48
3
Catherine Trinidad
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.44
3
Ginny Mayer
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.43
2.5
Deborah Hullings-Le
20W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Diana Cin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.