Teams

Beechmont

2023 OH OV SPRING Career A40&O Cincinnati · 2023 Spring Career A 40&O 4.0W Cincinnati

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-18vs HarpersWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslee Uhl / Meicheng Chiang vs Karen Buddemeyer / Carole Meldon6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMissy Davis vs Kerry Ellensohn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Baer / Terra Bales vs Kerry Hendel / Joanne Andersen7-5, 6-2
2023-07-11vs Five Seasons KentuckyWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeslee Uhl / Arica McCracken vs Sadia Ahmad / Christine Frey3-6, 6-3, 5-1
W#1 SinglesMeicheng Chiang vs Mindy Hodge6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Persinger / Missy Davis vs Maria McMain / Krista Mcginness6-0, 6-1
2023-06-27vs CamargoWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslee Uhl / Meicheng Chiang vs Cacki Jones / Shellie Leder6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerra Bales / Amanda Brown vs MacKenzie Curt / Jennifer Morgan6-1, 3-6, 2-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Baer / Trisha Raymond vs Dara Hudson / Stacy Hiatt3-6, 6-1, 5-2
2023-06-20vs Queen City WhiteLost 04
L#1 DoublesMeicheng Chiang / Melissa Powell vs Sheri Frey / Bethe Orlando5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTerra Bales vs Amy Ellis0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Chabot / Tracy Coleman vs Felicia Bourbon / Lisa Whitling6-4, 2-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesAmanda Brown / Julia Fox vs Jeanne Miller / Sandra Stephens3-6, 6-7
2023-06-13vs Queen City SilverWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Chabot / Amanda Brown vs Heather Tash / Stephanie Besl6-2, 1-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTrisha Raymond vs Dana Hecker6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Powell / Meicheng Chiang vs Lauren Keith / Susan Eberlein6-3, 6-2
2023-06-06vs HarpersWon 31
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Mendoza / Melissa Powell vs Karen Buddemeyer / Julie Baldwin4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMary Persinger vs Molly Tyger6-2, 2-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Richardson / Julia Fox vs Sarah Kirlin / Lisa Schwartz6-2, 2-6, 5-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Baer / Arica McCracken vs Joanne Andersen / Kerry Hendel6-1, 6-1
2023-05-23vs Five Seasons KentuckyWon 31
W#1 DoublesNancy Chabot / Tracy Coleman vs Sadia Ahmad / Dina Gibson3-6, 6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJulia Fox vs Theresa Schenthal1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesArica McCracken / Trisha Raymond vs Christine Frey / Caroline Ritson4-6, 6-3, 5-3
W#3 DoublesTerra Bales / Missy Davis vs Krista Mcginness / Kathy Guess7-6, 3-6, 2-0
2023-05-16vs CamargoWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslee Uhl / Amanda Brown vs Ashley Long / Elizabeth Jones7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTrisha Raymond vs Cacki Jones6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeicheng Chiang / Phyllis Mendoza vs Dara Hudson / Jennifer Morgan6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 Spring Career A 40&O 4.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Phyllis Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Arica McCracken
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ann Baer
published 4
3.70
Julia Fox
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Meicheng Chiang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Leslee Uhl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Persinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Missy Davis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Nancy Chabot
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Terra Bales
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tracy Coleman
published
Trisha Raymond
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Coleman + Phyllis Mendoza4254% gamesnot enough data
Phyllis Mendoza + Meicheng Chiang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phyllis Mendoza
45W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Arica McCracken
31W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Ann Baer
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julia Fox
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Meicheng Chiang
34W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Leslee Uhl
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Persinger
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Missy Davis
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Chabot
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terra Bales
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Coleman
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trisha Raymond
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.