← Teams

SD 3.0 Santaluz/ Flores

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-15vs SD 3.0 RPTC/ LevineLost 0–1
L#1 SinglesChristina MacIer vs Khanh Nguyen3-6, 5-7
2023-05-28vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ La CrueLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChristina MacIer / Kristen Howell vs Megumi Bolger / Catherine Sheils4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDana McCrary vs Brianna Harris1-6, 1-6
2023-04-30vs SD 3.0 Santaluz/ VandlingLost 0–2
L#1 SinglesDana McCrary vs Rita Zitterman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristina MacIer / Kristen Howell vs CHRISTINE DWYER / Debbie Kuntz5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-23vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC/ EdwardsWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesSheri McKenna / Christina MacIer vs Sybilla Dorros / Jillian Rodriguez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kristen Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Christina MacIer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Dana McCrary
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
—
Guissu Baier
published 3
2.72
Amy Poling
published 3
2.54
Karla Banning
published —
2.34
AMY VANDENBERG
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina MacIer + Kristen Howell14–854% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Howell
66W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Christina MacIer
68W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Dana McCrary
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Guissu Baier
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
—
3
Amy Poling
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
—
Karla Banning
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
AMY VANDENBERG
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.