Teams

TOC.Stogner

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-09vs MD.RiddickWon 20
W#2 DoublesReece Desonglo / Ben Desonglo vs Jonathan Fisher / Matthew Winters6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Daniel / Jeff Heinz vs Austin Maack / Scott Ulrich6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-25vs TOC.DesuWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoah Yao / Mick Tomey vs Ramesh Uppuluri / Manik Parsa6-3, 6-2
2022-09-18vs MVL.HariharanLost 01
L#3 DoublesPeter Olmos / Noah Yao vs Olimani Deivasigamani / Santosh Voruganti0-6, 4-6
2022-08-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesBen Desonglo / Reece Desonglo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesMario Karcevski / Jeff Heinz vs Michael Littlefield / Tom Qian7-6, 6-2
2022-08-14vs MD.RiddickSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Baldwin / Jeff Heinz vs John Park / Grayson Hale4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMick Tomey / Noah Yao vs Cullen Lee / Jonathan Fisher6-2, 6-4
2022-08-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMauricio Vargas / Jeff Heinz vs Michael Wood / Aaron Young3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Mark Baldwin
published
3.67
Reece Desonglo
published
3.36
Craig Brehmer
published 3.5
Noah Yao
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.25
Todd Bachman
published
3.05
Stephen Fu
published 3.5
3.03
Ben Desonglo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Scott Daniel
published
2.90
Jeff Heinz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Peter Olmos
published
Mario Karcevski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Fu + Noah Yao213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Baldwin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Reece Desonglo
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%10%90%
3.67
3.5
Craig Brehmer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Noah Yao
46W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Bachman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–130L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Ben Desonglo
94W–84L career · 2 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Jeff Heinz
41W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Peter Olmos
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Mario Karcevski
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.