Teams

Sweet Warriors II

Adult 40 & Over Fall · 3.0 Women Central

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-10-21vs PRC CosmosLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarion Coleman / Nancy Paquette vs Jill Vicario / Marlene Mannion0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPearl Albrecht / Shara Hofing vs Jill Schulz / Karen Marlib4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFrancesca Corrias / Julie Ambra vs Suzanne Proulx / Carol Jacobs3-6, 2-6
2020-10-14vs PRC HurricanesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarion Coleman / Shara Hofing vs Jacinta Samuel / Debbye Castoldi2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Ambra / Francesca Corrias vs Sharon Ainsworth / Catherine Judd Hirsch3-6, 3-6
2020-10-07vs Sweet WarriorsLost 03
L#1 DoublesShara Hofing / Debra McCann vs Michele Lopez / Lynne Ferrandino2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFrancesca Corrias / Julie Ambra vs Nuala Ann Passannante / Sharon Litvinsky3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKathleen Murphy / Marion Coleman vs Kim Berkuta / LESLIE URUBSHUROW0-6, 1-6
2020-09-30vs PRC CosmosLost 02
L#1 DoublesPearl Albrecht / Shara Hofing vs Jill Vicario / Sandy Brown1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Ambra / Francesca Corrias vs Jill Schulz / Lillian Velazquez1-6, 0-6
2020-09-23vs PRC HurricanesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Ambra / Francesca Corrias vs Melva Adamson / Jacinta Samuel0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarion Coleman / Pearl Albrecht vs Roberta Kressel / Lynne Drachtman0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2020-09-16vs Sweet WarriorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Ambra / Francesca Corrias vs Nuala Ann Passannante / Kim Berkuta6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShara Hofing vs LESLIE URUBSHUROW2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women Central
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRC Hurricanes0615920186
2PRC Cosmos0615921159
3Sweet Warriors II0602448286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Francesca Corrias
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Shara Hofing
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Marion Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Coleman + Francesca Corrias134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Francesca Corrias
56W–93L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Shara Hofing
49W–110L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
2.60
Marion Coleman
5W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.