Teams

WI Adult MidTri Singles Men TPC Wisc Quinlivan

2026 WI Other · WI Adult MidTri Singles Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-17Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBrian Quinlivan vs Alex Dundas6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSujay K Shankar vs Mark Sansait2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesDaniel Jing vs Christian Voskuil0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAugust LePique vs Mark Sansait6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSujay K Shankar vs Jonathan Figueira6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBrian Quinlivan vs Shane Jones3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDaniel Jing vs Christian Voskuil6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAugust LePique vs Jonathan Figueira3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesDaniel Jing vs Matt Trowbridge6-2, 6-0
2026-02-01Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBrian Quinlivan vs Alex Dundas5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult MidTri Singles Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Max Bohn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.51
August LePique
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Matthew Noack
published
4.18
Sujay K Shankar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.89
Enes Akyuz
usually #1 Singles 79%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
3.88
Eric Czarnecki
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.85
Brian Quinlivan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Jeremy Sager
usually #3 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Christopher Cusack
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.52
Shaleen Deep
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Daniel Jing
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Ulugbek Kamilov
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #3 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

August LePique + Matthew Noack4159% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Cusack + Shaleen Deep404 matchesnot enough data
August LePique + Enes Akyuz213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Quinlivan + Enes Akyuz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Bohn
69W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
4.55
4.5
August LePique
37W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.51
Matthew Noack
12W–4L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Sujay K Shankar
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Enes Akyuz
103W–61L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Eric Czarnecki
94W–49L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Brian Quinlivan
34W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Jeremy Sager
59W–50L career · 9 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Christopher Cusack
82W–60L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Shaleen Deep
65W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Daniel Jing
35W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
Ulugbek Kamilov
32W–33L career · 9 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.