Teams

MAC-Casebeer

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.61 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Jeri Finn
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4
3.65
Deana Julka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Clarice Brown
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Tove Maloco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Katie Jurgenson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Andrea Lamprecht
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kayla Casebeer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Amy Risch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Lara Greenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2020-02-28Won 40
W#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Rachel Young vs Jeane Anastas / Janna McDougall6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTove Maloco / Karla Nutt vs Ann Hays / Diana Crawford6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Kim Tellin4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Clarice Brown vs Georgia Harker / April Mayers6-2, 6-1
2020-02-23Won 50
W#1 DoublesClarice Brown / Elizabeth Burns vs Minhhang Tran / Lynda Gordon6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJeri Finn vs Erin Canova6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Risch / Karla Nutt vs Vanessa Gallant / Laxmi Vishwanathan6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Mary Sadlouskos2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Heyworth / Lara Greenberg vs Raquel Rich / Denise Westby6-0, 6-1
2020-02-07Won 32
W#1 DoublesRachel Young / Clarice Brown vs Sherie Briggs / Gail Bolte6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Lauren Smith3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs Amy Crews / Adele Preston2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAndrea Lamprecht vs Emily Qi6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMegan Heyworth / Tove Maloco vs Silvia Sacchini / Heather MacPherson6-3, 6-2
2020-01-26Won 31
W#1 DoublesClarice Brown / Jeri Finn vs Linnette Donohue / Alexandra Gewant6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLara Greenberg / Deana Julka vs Kiersten Lake / Jennifer Trank6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAndrea Lamprecht vs Robin Welter6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Elizabeth Burns vs Stefanie Orrick / Christen Kolberg7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2020-01-19Won 40
W#1 DoublesJeri Finn / Katy Williams vs Valerie Neill / Shannon Davis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Lamprecht / Tove Maloco vs Anna Eggerts / JC Chow6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesClarice Brown vs Phyllis Ghazi6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShane Fuller / Kayla Casebeer vs Gwen Kulak / Miriam Latzer6-0, 6-0
2020-01-12Won 30
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Jeri Finn vs Karen Walker / Anne Johnson6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Patricia Kuchar6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Lamprecht / Tove Maloco vs Stephanie Harbell / Jennifer Gwin6-2, 6-1
2019-12-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesClarice Brown / Zachary Wright vs Stephanie Harbell / Maxwell Fisher6-2, 7-6
2019-12-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesClarice Brown / Zachary Wright vs Kate Kearney / Ruslan Askarov6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jeri Finn
149W–71L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Deana Julka
69W–28L career
6%94%0%
3.65
4
Clarice Brown
91W–39L career
11%88%0%
3.62
3.5
Tove Maloco
86W–43L career
0%93%7%
3.43
3.5
Katie Jurgenson
84W–60L career
0%95%5%
3.40
3.5
Andrea Lamprecht
55W–48L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Kayla Casebeer
93W–63L career
not enough data
3.5
Amy Risch
46W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.13
3
Lara Greenberg
74W–43L career
0%64%36%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.