Teams

HEB - Bianca

2025 Valley Adult 40 & Over 2.5 W- 5.0 W - Spring · 3.5 Ladies

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesKrista Banuelos / Leticia Garcia vs Lucinda Rosignol / Denise Williams7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnica Diaz vs Audrey Hooks6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdele Clinton-Solis / Ana Rangel vs Paula Fields / Susan Pockrus2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEva Chipps / Kathleen Murphy vs Tina Buford / Linda Sheline0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLeticia Garcia / Krista Banuelos vs Paula Fields / Susan Pockrus1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAnica Diaz vs Audrey Hooks0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEva Chipps / Ana Rangel vs Natalie Leal / Margo Russell5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Murphy / Leticia Sanchez vs Rosalie Elliff / Elsie Kokal6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Anica Diaz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Leticia Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Eva Chipps
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Krista Banuelos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Adele Clinton-Solis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Ana Rangel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
OLGA Pena de Moreno
published
Monica Ramirez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anica Diaz + Ana Rangel6265% games+16.8% vs expected
Adele Clinton-Solis + Ana Rangel3346% games−1.8% vs expected
Adele Clinton-Solis + OLGA Pena de Moreno4744% games−4.5% vs expected
Ana Rangel + Krista Banuelos3257% gamesnot enough data
OLGA Pena de Moreno + Krista Banuelos134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anica Diaz
29W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Leticia Sanchez
13W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Eva Chipps
5W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Krista Banuelos
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Adele Clinton-Solis
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Ana Rangel
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
OLGA Pena de Moreno
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Monica Ramirez
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.