Teams

HG Topspinners - L. Marinez

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-18vs Yachty by Nature - L. DavittLost 01
L#1 DoublesColette O'Connor / Lisa Marinez vs Ali Garrity / Amy Hale6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Marinez / Carla Chappell vs Cindy Arment / Carrie Bradley2-6, 1-6
2024-02-26vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Marinez / Jan Sayad vs Crystal Vanmeter / Sandra Bell2-6, 0-6
2024-02-12vs Buckhorn Sweetspots - C. DemingWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Marinez / Jan Sayad vs Barbara Kouimanis / Sara Newsom6-4, 6-1
2024-01-29vs Van Dyke - P. MooreWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Marinez / Christy Schnell vs Michelle Barry / Cherie Adkins6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Marinez / Jan Sayad vs Dorothy Flair / Juanita Vila6-3, 7-5
2024-01-15vs Avila - A. StaffordLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Marinez / Christy Schnell vs Anne Stafford / Joy Themides5-7, 6-7
2024-01-08vs Palma Ceia Penn Pirates - E. PentoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Marinez / Colleen Lenaghan vs Elizabeth Pento / Sibyl Curtis4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Christy Schnell
published 3.5
3.17
Cecilia Rattes
published 3.5
2.99
Catalina Perez
published 3
2.94
Melissa Vickers
published
2.89
Lisa Marinez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.70
Colleen Lenaghan
published 3
2.59
Shanna Kim
published
2.43
Colette O'Connor
published 3
2.10
Carla Chappell
published 2.5
Jan Sayad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Marinez + Colleen Lenaghan6547% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Schnell
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Cecilia Rattes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Catalina Perez
17W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Lisa Marinez
122W–115L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Colleen Lenaghan
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Shanna Kim
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Colette O'Connor
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Carla Chappell
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jan Sayad
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.