Teams

Pelton/Wall Day

2026 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-06vs Bowen LeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Richard / Susan Wilson vs Anne Goodwin / Laura Bowen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachael Bondy / Katie Monroe vs Denise Evans / June Highfill6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPatricia Pelton / Cheryl Matsche vs Roberta Phelps / Anita Holsonback6-3, 6-3
2026-05-05vs Graeser 2026 55+ 3.5 SpringWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Wilson / Rachael Bondy vs Pati DeOliva / Stacie Williams6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Monroe / Karen Wall vs Joan Cozza / Ewa Marziano6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDawn McKenna / Jacqueline Travagliante vs Shelley Livengood / Katherine O'Bryan7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-04-20vs Sample 3.5 - 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Richard / Susan Wilson vs PJ Bolduc / Kelly Stephens6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiana Messier / Phyllis Sheets vs Juliana Mastroserio / Terry Thompkins6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Pelton / Katie Monroe vs Kathleen Kear / Connie West6-2, 6-0
2026-03-28vs Murray/Broach 3.5 55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Richard / Lisa Williamson vs Julie Scull / Joelle Crocker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn McKenna / Cheryl Matsche vs Christine Bean / Anne Murray4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Wall / Phyllis Sheets vs Shannon Stephens / Amy Sweyer6-4, 7-6
2026-03-26vs Weeks (DAY)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatricia Pelton / Phyllis Sheets vs Valerie Wiegman / Hope Sloan5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Richard / Lisa Williamson vs Ilona Johnson / Ashby Neal6-3, 6-2
2026-03-13vs Dunn/Sullins DAYWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Sheets / Diana Messier vs Carrie Guerrette / Kelli Brownfield6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLois Randall / Dawn McKenna vs Kathleen Hawkins / Ange Urlaub6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatie Monroe / Rachael Bondy vs Amy Dunn / Jennifer Ashford6-1, 6-1
2026-03-02vs Kontoulas (DAY)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Sheets / Diana Messier vs Tayna Jones / Kathleen Murphy6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRachael Bondy / Susan Wilson vs Helen Cressy / Lisa Toomey7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Richard / Lisa Williamson vs Tara MacCall / Karen O'Connor6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Catherine Richard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Diana Messier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Phyllis Sheets
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Katie Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Lois Randall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Rachael Bondy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Patricia Pelton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Karen Wall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Jacqueline Travagliante
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Cheryl Matsche
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Lisa Daly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Dawn McKenna
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
Sabrina Nikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wall + Katie Monroe314 matchesnot enough data
Lois Randall + Dawn McKenna314 matchesnot enough data
Diana Messier + Phyllis Sheets303 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Pelton + Lisa Daly213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Monroe + Dawn McKenna213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Richard
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Diana Messier
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Phyllis Sheets
12W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
Katie Monroe
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lois Randall
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Rachael Bondy
17W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Patricia Pelton
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Karen Wall
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jacqueline Travagliante
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheryl Matsche
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Lisa Daly
20W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Dawn McKenna
19W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Sabrina Nikel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.