Teams

RIO DEL ORO 65AM8.0A

2024 ADULT 65&Over · Men 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-12vs GOLD RIVER RC 65AM8.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Johnson / Stephen Goff vs Jeffery Foran / Vince Gezi4-6, 2-6
2024-03-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Dozier / Stephen Goff vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-15vs GOLD RIVER RC 65AM8.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Goff / James Johnson vs Maurice Smith / Kevin O'Brien4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-06vs GOLD RIVER RC 65AM8.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesStephen Goff / Paul Taylor vs Mark Silva / Greg Ingram4-6, 3-6
2024-03-01vs GOLD RIVER RC 65AM8.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesStephen Goff / Paul Taylor vs Jeffery Foran / Kevin O'Brien2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Kendall Homer
published
4.19
Alfred Sisneros
published 4.5
3.84
Mike Friedman
published
Barry Young
published 4
3.75
Michael Dozier
published
3.74
Vansen Wong
published
3.56
Stephen Goff
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Chris Iwata
published 3.5
3.33
Anthony Jelinek
published 3.5
Frank Valls
published
Paul Taylor
published
Zeke Montes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alfred Sisneros + Mike Friedman5163% gamesnot enough data
Barry Young + Michael Dozier314 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Homer + Paul Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Jelinek + Michael Dozier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Homer
20W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Alfred Sisneros
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Mike Friedman
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Barry Young
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Dozier
34W–30L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Vansen Wong
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Stephen Goff
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Chris Iwata
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Anthony Jelinek
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Frank Valls
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Taylor
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Zeke Montes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.