Teams

BLOCK/18/6.5/NOD/CP

2025 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-13vs Colosino/18/6.5/NOD/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Block / Kathleen Berry vs Jessica Mathieson / Maggie Tarleton6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLesley Retif / Tessa Izdepski vs Megan Colosino / Jessie Dauterive7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Julianne Leblanc vs Theresa Bonin / Amanda Swift6-4, 6-3
2025-10-07vs Eaton/18/6.5/NOD/MCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKylee Alvarez / Catherine Fabre vs Ashley Eaton / Jessica Moran1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Helm / Tessa Izdepski vs Noreen Bonifacic / Amy Maniscalco1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Berry / Lesley Retif vs Ashley Gootee / Leslie Fawer4-6, 2-6
2025-09-30vs McLanahan/18/6.5/NOD/MCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLesley Retif / Sarah Block vs Kathleen Kazour / Shannon Harrison3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKylee Alvarez / Tessa Izdepski vs Cheryl Streiffer / Jan Tolar0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Brianne Whelan vs Cherie Moore / Kathryn Wild1-6, 3-6
2025-09-23vs Singer-Holder/18/ 6.5/ NOD/AUDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Block / Kylee Alvarez vs Kristen Singer / Bridget Torregrosa6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Berry / Sarah Helm vs Lauren England / Elizabeth Charvat1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrianne Whelan / Catherine Fabre vs Jessica Barnett / Sophia Hamm1-6, 2-6
2025-09-15vs Kuruda/Hebert 18/6.5/NOD/CPWon 21
L#1 DoublesKylee Alvarez / Catherine Fabre vs Danielle Kuruda / Nathalie Dubois0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Berry / Julianne Leblanc vs Laura Russo / Cynthia Knight7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTaylor Spansel / Sarah Block vs Joan Hebert / Mary Fein6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-09vs OGDEN/18/6.5/NOD/NOCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKylee Alvarez / Kathleen Berry vs Paige McCarthy / Jeannie Hillery7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTessa Izdepski / Brianne Whelan vs Jeanne Swingle / Logan Senior0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Julianne Leblanc vs Tully Jordan / Lindsey Schafer6-3, 6-2
2025-09-02vs Tafaro/Ursin/18/6.5/NOD/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Berry / Tessa Izdepski vs Holly Vinet / Sarah Junius1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Block / Julianne Leblanc vs Samantha Hill / Anne Hughs0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Fabre / Sarah Helm vs Jessica Kee / Kelsi Schmitz3-6, 2-6
2025-08-25vs GRIFFITH/18/6.5/NOD/NOLTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Block / Kathleen Berry vs Lauren Wakeman / Emily Whelan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKylee Alvarez / Lesley Retif vs Neely Griffith / Abigail DesHotels7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulianne Leblanc / Brianne Whelan vs Marcie Gardner / Samantha Stokes6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 NO (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Sarah Block
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.99
Kathleen Berry
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Brianne Whelan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Catherine Fabre
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.72
Sarah Helm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Tessa Izdepski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.52
Julianne Leblanc
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.45
Hellen Cappo
published
2.41
Taylor Spansel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kara Griffin-Ruwin
published
Kylee Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lesley Retif
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Berry + Sarah Block224 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Fabre + Brianne Whelan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Block
8W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kathleen Berry
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Brianne Whelan
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Catherine Fabre
8W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Helm
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Tessa Izdepski
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.67
Julianne Leblanc
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Hellen Cappo
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.45
Taylor Spansel
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Kara Griffin-Ruwin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kylee Alvarez
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lesley Retif
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.