Teams

Wishing/Murfreesboro

2025 Adult 55 & Over - Murfreesboro · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-30vs Walker/Crenshaw/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Janet Adamson vs Debbi Booton / Sally Wrather6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Jennifer Kelley vs Melanie Mohr / Kimberly Garner6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Wishing / Joy Owens vs Julie Shaub / Joni Covington7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Walker/Crenshaw/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Corn / Patricia Eudaley vs Stacey Andrews / Tonya Morris4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCollier Andress Smith / Janet Adamson vs Jane Crenshaw / Barbara Grubbs6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShannon Johnson Waxman / Brenda Monajjem vs Melanie Mohr / Kimberly Garner4-6, 6-7
2025-03-15vs Walker/Crenshaw/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrenda Monajjem / Jennifer Kelley vs Debbi Booton / Sally Wrather7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Adamson / Collier Andress Smith vs Tamara Graham / Carla Rosenthal6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Dana McKee vs Stacey Andrews / Tonya Morris2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Collier Andress Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Dana McKee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Karen Corn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Brenda Monajjem
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Joy Owens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Jan Phanthalangsy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Wishing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Eudaley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Johnson Waxman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Monajjem + Joy Owens1444% games−9.4% vs expected
Jan Phanthalangsy + Brenda Monajjem044 matchesnot enough data
Collier Andress Smith + Brenda Monajjem303 matchesnot enough data
Collier Andress Smith + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Collier Andress Smith
31W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Dana McKee
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Karen Corn
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Brenda Monajjem
26W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Joy Owens
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jan Phanthalangsy
17W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Julie Wishing
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Eudaley
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Johnson Waxman
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.