Teams

Carr-Happy Campers-Woodlands Parks

*2026 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 NoHo Women · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-29vs Battle-Lucky Strings-Woodlands ParksSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNur Kamilah Chrenka / Tina Marin vs Shanna Lohr / Vanessa Krantzcke4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesShay Williams vs Shannon Broadbent6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAimee Shepherd / Yachun Hou vs Robin Soulant / Kimberlee Combs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesErin Carr / Maria Gilroy vs Jennifer Guillory / Denae Valverde4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-16vs Weber-Wice Aces-Woodlands ParksLost 13
L#1 DoublesBETH PLOCH / Maria Gilroy vs Danielle Sokol / Brionna Mayr6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatherina Santoso vs Katie Radcliffe6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristy Smith / Susan Mankoff vs Misty Winter / Rachel Polsky3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesShay Williams / Samira Collado-Yunes vs Alejandra Guerrero / Adriana Hernandez5-7, 1-6
2026-04-08vs Eissler-Love Hurts-Woodlands CCLost 23
L#1 DoublesYachun Hou / Rachael Compofelice vs Valerie Eissler / Kristin Valicevic5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatherina Santoso vs Lacey Hansen7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBETH PLOCH / Shay Williams vs Jaclyn Babcock / Norma Marquez1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErin Carr / Samira Collado-Yunes vs Brittany Noyes / Laura Vander Voort6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#4 DoublesNur Kamilah Chrenka / Tina Marin vs Charlotte Cloninger / Jennifer Martin2-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesMaria Gilroy / Samira Collado-Yunes vs Betsy Lyman / Ashley Dalrymple4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKatherina Santoso vs Beverley Lastinger6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYachun Hou / Stacy Davis vs Chelsea KENDRICK / Claire Wackman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristy Smith / Rachael Compofelice vs Emily Tupper / Jenny Usner6-0, 6-2
W#4 DoublesAimee Shepherd / Nur Kamilah Chrenka vs Lezlie Herm / Falynn Derderian7-5, 6-2
2026-03-18vs Redfield-Racket Gals-BentwaterSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBETH PLOCH / Shay Williams vs Lynn Arthur / Suzanne Dupre6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesYachun Hou vs Amy Hayden6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTina Marin / Hilde Gjervik vs Kelly Davis / Brenda Palamar2-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesErin Carr / Rachael Compofelice vs Stacee Verkon / Marcy Millar6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSamira Collado-Yunes / Katherina Santoso vs Kaley Majeski / Ruby Behnke2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesYachun Hou vs Megan Coney3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHilde Gjervik / Susan Mankoff vs Carol Buonfiglio / Jennifer Szymanski5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBETH PLOCH / Shay Williams vs Eunice Skehan / Regina Khim6-3, 6-4
L#4 DoublesRachael Compofelice / Maria Gilroy vs Amy Glenney / Dyana Spearman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMaria Gilroy / Susan Mankoff vs Catherine Gasper / Mary Clawges7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKatherina Santoso vs Rossana Gomez6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesErin Carr / Aimee Shepherd vs Tatiana Kast / Sandra Thornton6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
BETH PLOCH
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Samira Collado-Yunes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Katherina Santoso
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Yachun Hou
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Shay Williams
usually #1 Singles 20%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Aimee Shepherd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Erin Carr
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Nur Kamilah Chrenka
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Susan Mankoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Rachael Compofelice
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Maria Gilroy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Tina Marin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shay Williams + BETH PLOCH314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
BETH PLOCH
11W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.62
Samira Collado-Yunes
7W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Katherina Santoso
7W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Yachun Hou
13W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Shay Williams
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Aimee Shepherd
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Erin Carr
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Nur Kamilah Chrenka
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Susan Mankoff
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Rachael Compofelice
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
Maria Gilroy
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tina Marin
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.