Teams

LTC:Senioritas:Reynolds/Ayre

2023 WMA Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-03vs BAY:Net Results:Alman/DesmondSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCynni Finn / Kate Reynolds vs Ann Kochis / Michelle Immler6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaurie Andretta / Jennifer Ayre vs Claire MacH / Katherine Desmond5-7, 0-6
2023-05-20vs BOUS:Berkshire Cougars:FedererLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Samantha Edwards vs Susan Wissler / Gwen Marrion7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Reynolds / Cynni Finn vs Janice Tynan / Linda Shafiroff6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Andretta / Marie Roncalli vs Wendy Federer / Jean Robbins2-6, 4-6
2023-04-22vs BAY:Net Results:Alman/DesmondWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Susan Katsoulis vs Lucy Alman / Julie Pallant6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKate Reynolds / Cynni Finn vs Jacqueline Scott / Patricia Clayton5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Gould / Elizabeth Maher vs Katherine Desmond / Carol MacColl2-6, 0-6
2023-04-08vs BOUS:Berkshire Cougars:FedererLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Kate Reynolds vs Carolyn McGarr-Lee / Cynthia Roman6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCynni Finn / Susan Katsoulis vs Linda Shafiroff / Janice Tynan5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Pancione / Johanne Presser vs Janet Lee / Mika Hirai4-6, 4-6
2023-03-18vs BAY:Net Results:Alman/DesmondWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Edwards / Susan Katsoulis vs Carol Anderson / Ann Kochis7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKate Reynolds / Johanne Presser vs Claire MacH / Elizabeth Varner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Pancione / Elizabeth Maher vs Carol MacColl / Jacqueline Scott6-3, 6-4
2023-03-05vs BOUS:Berkshire Cougars:FedererLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ayre / Samantha Edwards vs Carolyn McGarr-Lee / Gwen Marrion6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Life / Kate Reynolds vs Janice Tynan / Susan Wissler6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Maher / Laurie Andretta vs Mika Hirai / Wendy Federer0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BOUS:Berkshire Cougars:Federer5114415152
2LTC:Senioritas:Reynolds/Ayre2471124177
3BAY:Net Results:Alman/Desmond2461224156

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynni Finn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Samantha Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Susan Katsoulis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Kate Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Patricia Pancione
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Lauren Life
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Jennifer Ayre
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Marie Roncalli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Elizabeth Maher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Connie Gould
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Johanne Presser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Laurie Andretta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stacie Mancuso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Ayre + Susan Katsoulis6164% games+8.8% vs expected
Lauren Life + Susan Katsoulis4163% games+7.4% vs expected
Susan Katsoulis + Samantha Edwards16456% games−0.7% vs expected
Kate Reynolds + Jennifer Ayre141453% games−1.6% vs expected
Jennifer Ayre + Samantha Edwards4553% games−3.1% vs expected
Cynni Finn + Johanne Presser2348% gamesnot enough data
Cynni Finn + Kate Reynolds224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Ayre + Elizabeth Maher404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynni Finn
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Edwards
71W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.75
Susan Katsoulis
43W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kate Reynolds
30W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Patricia Pancione
79W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Lauren Life
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jennifer Ayre
77W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Marie Roncalli
218W–105L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Maher
122W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Connie Gould
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Johanne Presser
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Andretta
71W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacie Mancuso
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.