Teams

Burns - Congo 3.5 Congressional

2025 Montgomery Doubles Summer Women · Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-26vs Cornelius 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesMeaghan LeNard / Nicole Rosser vs Tara Cooksey / Megan Rappolt6-1, 6-0
2025-08-06vs Spencer - Start with Love 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChrista Meyers / Nicole Rosser vs Tracy Walls / Deborah Thompson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-21vs Pugh - Norbeck SunsettersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracie Rolle / Christy Sporidis vs Jackie Schaffer / Diane Lee6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChrista Meyers / Nina Price vs Carey Buffington / Lisa Sefcik2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Moore / Mary Penny vs Tammy Paidas / Kiera Johnson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-07vs Cornelius 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Burns / Tracie Rolle vs Margaret Cornelius / Megan Rappolt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNina Price / Christy Sporidis vs Stevi Calandra / Lemin Xiao6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Nicole Rosser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Jennifer Hemann
published
3.29
Christy Sporidis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christa Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Julie Willard
published
3.18
Nina Price
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jennifer Najar
published
3.11
Meaghan LeNard
published
3.10
Rachel Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Carina Bartozzi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mary Penny
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracie Rolle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Sporidis + Nina Price3355% games+4.2% vs expected
Meaghan LeNard + Jennifer Hemann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicole Rosser
108W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Jennifer Hemann
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Christy Sporidis
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christa Meyers
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Willard
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Nina Price
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Jennifer Najar
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Meaghan LeNard
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Rachel Burns
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Carina Bartozzi
11W–3L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Mary Penny
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tracie Rolle
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.