Teams

AConger (OPRC)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-10-18Won 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Smith / Amy Augustine vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatharine Cheek / Arlene Conger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEsther Farnham / Joe-Anne Saldarini vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-16vs RKlepser (Barclay Downs)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Augustine / Ashley Smith vs Kathleen Smith / Rosie Rogers7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTracy Brading / Arlene Conger vs Beth Carpenter / Louisa Jones3-6, 3-6
2023-09-29vs TKessler/JWare (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Augustine / Kristen Montgomery vs Mollie James / Amanda Price6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Ashley Smith vs Meg Perry / Perri Freel1-6, 1-6
2023-09-22vs JCugliari (BCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKatharine Cheek / Joe-Anne Saldarini vs Ami Stein / Beth Robinson6-3, 6-3
2023-09-21vs JGrahl/Mulcahy (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSherri Ehrenberg / Mary Kay Deering vs Kimberly Diaz / Rosalyn Kartes2-6, 2-6
2023-09-15vs TGreen (Chestnut Square)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Augustine / Esther Farnham vs Danna Jean Pompeo / Karen Daniels-Lynch4-6, 1-1
2023-09-08vs JGarvey (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesArlene Conger / Lynn Davis vs Victoria Wasulko / Elizabeth McCombs6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Smith / Amy Augustine vs Cynthia Burns / Kathleen Griffith6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSherri Ehrenberg / Mary Kay Deering vs Janet Garvey / Candace MacIntyre6-0, 6-4
2023-09-01vs CPurvis (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Montgomery / Joe-Anne Saldarini vs Susan Jaffe / Courtney Sito4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEsther Farnham / Mary Kay Deering vs Kristine Evans / Jill Marcus6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesArlene Conger / Tracy Brading vs Thanh Nga McIver / Mary Parker6-1, 6-2
2023-08-25vs HHope/HPhelps (Firethorne)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAshley Smith / Amy Augustine vs Melissa Misplay / Brittany Padgett6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSherri Ehrenberg / Christi Hart vs Allison Mitchell / HEATHER PHELPS7-5, 6-4
2023-08-18vs SPierle (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAshley Smith / Joe-Anne Saldarini vs Kristin Verrill / Donna DePollo5-7, 6-7
2023-08-11vs DVliet (Raintree)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAshley Smith / Mary Kay Deering vs Donna Savage / Jennifer Bean6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesArlene Conger / Joe-Anne Saldarini vs Megan Bishop Quirk / Sybil Cioffi6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Christi Hart
published 4.5
4.16
Esther Farnham
published 4.5
4.08
Katharine Cheek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Tracy Brading
published 4
4.00
Courtney Reynolds
published 4.5
3.99
Sherri Ehrenberg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Joe-Anne Saldarini
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.92
3.92
Amy Augustine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Mary Kay Deering
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Arlene Conger
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Kristen Montgomery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Hart + Sherri Ehrenberg5362% games+1.8% vs expected
Katharine Cheek + Christi Hart3254% games−0.3% vs expected
Mary Kay Deering + Sherri Ehrenberg8161% gamesnot enough data
Katharine Cheek + Sherri Ehrenberg314 matchesnot enough data
Joe-Anne Saldarini + Arlene Conger314 matchesnot enough data
Katharine Cheek + Arlene Conger123 matchesnot enough data
Katharine Cheek + Tracy Brading123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christi Hart
19W–26L career · type D · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Esther Farnham
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Katharine Cheek
35W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Tracy Brading
111W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.01
4.5
Courtney Reynolds
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
4.00
Sherri Ehrenberg
84W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Joe-Anne Saldarini
150W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Christina McWilliams
46W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Amy Augustine
95W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
Mary Kay Deering
105W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Arlene Conger
71W–48L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Kristen Montgomery
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.