Teams

CTC - Edwards (W)

Cherokee Fall ('24) - Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Adult 18 & Over 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.19 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-20vs Eagle Watch - FiorentiniWon 20
W#2 DoublesPamela Cleaver / Brooke Hilyer vs Elise Graham / Chinny Law4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarlotta Fulton / Martina Negron vs Christi Fiorentini / Laura DiTomasso7-5, 7-6
2024-10-30vs Eagle Watch - FiorentiniWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Luke / Tammy Johnston vs Sydney Pujadas / Maddie Johnson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Edwards / Brooke Hilyer vs Elise Graham / Chinny Law7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTina Binette / Beth Reynolds vs Laura DiTomasso / Karen Williams6-1, 6-1
2024-10-09vs Eagle Watch - FiorentiniLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeressina Araiza / Alisa Price vs Sydney Pujadas / Maddie Johnson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Cleaver / Brooke Hilyer vs Ansley Astuto / Chinny Law4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThea Stettler / Carlotta Fulton vs Christi Fiorentini / Monica Issa5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Adult 18 & Over 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Alisa Price
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.26
Anne Luke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
April Johnson
published 4.5
4.21
Tammy Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Brooke Hilyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Erica Rutledge
published
3.96
Pamela Cleaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carol Edwards
published 4
3.75
Tina Binette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Beth Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Martina Negron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Carlotta Fulton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Thea Stettler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Anita Davis
published 3.5
Teressina Araiza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Davis + Erica Rutledge6160% games+8.2% vs expected
Alisa Price + Tammy Johnston314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alisa Price
24W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
4.5
Anne Luke
38W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
April Johnson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Johnston
56W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Brooke Hilyer
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Erica Rutledge
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Pamela Cleaver
50W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Carol Edwards
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Binette
69W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Beth Reynolds
32W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Martina Negron
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Carlotta Fulton
29W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Thea Stettler
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Anita Davis
32W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Teressina Araiza
21W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.