Teams

LCTA55/Laquara/Maybank

Other Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Adult · 4.0

29 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-04vs LCTA55/Magnuson/LTPDILost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Holt / Garrett Riggins vs Steve Morse / Kirsten Lanphear4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Wilkins / Beth Mandell vs Stefanie McCarron / Keith Pridgen6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTom Cunneff / Linder Laffitte vs Charlene Magnuson / Craig Brown3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMolly Rosenquist / Pano Kordonis vs Corinne Updegrave / Mark Leeds2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Jacky / Stephanie Jacky vs Elyssa Snelgrove / Andrew Temple4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Mandell / Michael MacK vs Sarah Dacosta / Peter Brechtel2-6, 3-6
2026-06-13vs LCTA55/Pettersen/MPRWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jacky / David Jacky vs Annmarie Taggio / Frank Pettersen6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Dowd / Sam Wilburn vs Brenda Reagan / Thomas Reagan7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Shirley / Garrett Riggins vs Chris Lane / Stacey Cordina0-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-06vs LCTA55/Lee/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Jacky / David Jacky vs Bo McNinch / Jeannie Golden5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Holt / Sam Wilburn vs Jay Meyer / Charlotte Gerber6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Hamilton / Chris Wilkins vs Janine Dalva / Charles Lee6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesLaury Wehunt / Tom Cunneff vs Jennifer Williams / Angus Garfield4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Rosenquist / Michael MacK vs Elyssa Snelgrove / Chris Bright4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Stanley / Michael Laquara vs Molly Sapienza / Andrew Temple2-6, 2-6
2026-05-31vs LCTA55/Pettersen/MPRLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Laquara / Diana Shirley vs Brenda Reagan / Thomas Reagan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Mandell / Garrett Riggins vs Ceil Bruner / David Bruner2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Matheson / Stephen Yetman vs Jane Eckhardt / Mike Cladakis0-6, 4-6
2026-05-30vs LCTA55/Magnuson/LTPDILost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Matheson / Stephen Yetman vs Keith Pridgen / Stefanie McCarron2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinder Laffitte / Tom Cunneff vs Craig Brown / Samantha Walton4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKurtis Lamkin / Margaret Hamilton vs Kirsten Lanphear / Matthew Ellman3-6, 3-6
2026-05-23vs LCTA55/Lee/MPRLost 12
W#1 DoublesMolly Rosenquist / Art Harper vs Charlotte Gerber / Jay Meyer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClay Claiborne / Elizabeth Holt vs Genevieve McCutcheon / Leonard Douglas2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGreg Garvan / Diana Shirley vs Theodore Manos / Kelly Kruse4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Kopchains)7118615169
2LCTA55/Lee/MPR44121228215
3LCTA55/Magnuson/LTPDI26111329224
4LCTA55/Laquara/Maybank2661840260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Jane Dowd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Diana Shirley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Molly Rosenquist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Anna Stanley
published 4
3.70
Clay Claiborne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Beth Mandell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Beth Matheson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Stephanie Jacky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Laury Wehunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Elizabeth Holt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Jane Brennan
published
3.56
Kelli Ransone
published
3.56
Tom Cunneff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
3.54
Bobby Meadows
published 3.5
3.50
Art Harper
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.48
Greg Garvan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
David Jacky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Garrett Riggins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Chris Wilkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Sam Wilburn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Lance Tyner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Michael MacK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kurtis Lamkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linder Laffitte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Hamilton
published
Michael Laquara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pano Kordonis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Yetman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Jacky + David Jacky7354% games+13.2% vs expected
Tom Cunneff + Linder Laffitte2438% gamesnot enough data
Clay Claiborne + Elizabeth Holt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Dowd
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Diana Shirley
84W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Molly Rosenquist
63W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Anna Stanley
36W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Clay Claiborne
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Beth Mandell
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Beth Matheson
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Stephanie Jacky
41W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Laury Wehunt
67W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Elizabeth Holt
35W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jane Brennan
15W–26L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kelli Ransone
29W–41L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
Tom Cunneff
27W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Barbara Silveston
44W–22L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Bobby Meadows
60W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Art Harper
207W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Greg Garvan
33W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
David Jacky
81W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Garrett Riggins
35W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Chris Wilkins
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Sam Wilburn
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Lance Tyner
284W–198L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Michael MacK
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Kurtis Lamkin
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Linder Laffitte
107W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Hamilton
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Laquara
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pano Kordonis
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Yetman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.