Teams

Je.Wolborsky40M3.5

2025 Capital Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-01vs Gr.Swank40MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarc Kaufman / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Mitchell Wolborsky / Carrie Russell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTrey Morris / Michelle Staub vs Scott Walton / Ashley Walton4-6, 0-6
2025-07-25vs Je.Phillips40MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Marc Kaufman vs Jessica Phillips / David Coman1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Kiel / Scott Thurston vs Lori Elliott / Ronald Elliott6-3, 7-6
2025-07-18vs Ev.Fultz40MLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicki Swank / Frank Delucia vs Diane Williams / Lance Williams2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Staub / Trey Morris vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Brian Ross6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Scott Thurston vs Melissa Hill / Steve Crell7-6, 6-2
2025-07-11vs Ap.Lyon40MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Newson / Matthew Newson vs Allison DeMacy / Jason McGeorge3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Staub / Trey Morris vs Lauren King / Dylan DeMacy1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarc Kaufman / Jennifer Wolborsky vs April Lyon / Tim Lyon7-6, 6-3
2025-07-01vs Je.Phillips40MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Steve Abourisk vs David Hill / Elise Hamilton3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTrey Morris / Michelle Staub vs Lori Elliott / Ronald Elliott4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Newson / Matthew Newson vs Jessica Phillips / Matt Phillips1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-30vs Ap.Lyon40MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Thurston / Holly Atkinson vs April Lyon / Robert Caulfield4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Matthew Newson vs Lauren King / Dylan DeMacy2-6, 4-6
2025-06-27vs Jo.VanCampen40MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Steve Abourisk vs James Payne / Leigh Breischaft1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Atkinson / Scott Thurston vs Jeffery Troch / Sheila Breckenridge2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarc Kaufman / Michelle Staub vs John Richardson / Jeanette Gerould2-6, 3-6
2025-06-20vs Gr.Swank40MLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Newson / Matthew Newson vs Gretchen Swank / Jason Swank2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Scott Thurston vs Diane Allen / Mitchell Wolborsky0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Swank / Frank Delucia vs Katie Percy / Rahul Arora3-6, 3-6
2025-06-06vs Ev.Fultz40MLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Scott Thurston vs Liz Arcos / Jeffrey Pollack2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Kiel / Anthony Puccio vs Lisa Fultz / Evan Fultz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Marc Kaufman vs Laurie Reiss / Brian Ross3-6, 1-6
2025-05-23vs Jo.VanCampen40MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarc Kaufman / Vicki Swank vs John van Campen / Michell Wilson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTrey Morris / Michelle Staub vs Jennifer Troch / Jeffery Troch3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Puccio / Kathryn Kiel vs Alan Melichar / Jennifer van Campen6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Kathryn Kiel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Matthew Newson
published
Frank Delucia
published 3.5
3.25
Diane Abourisk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Trey Morris
published
3.15
Marc Kaufman
published
3.11
Holly Atkinson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.95
Vicki Swank
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Scott Thurston
published
2.63
Steve Abourisk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Michelle Staub
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Abourisk + Steve Abourisk82139% games+0.5% vs expected
Julie Newson + Matthew Newson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathryn Kiel
137W–120L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Matthew Newson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Frank Delucia
0W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diane Abourisk
104W–136L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Trey Morris
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Marc Kaufman
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Holly Atkinson
253W–179L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3.5
Vicki Swank
39W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–237L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Scott Thurston
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Steve Abourisk
21W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Michelle Staub
53W–90L career · 7 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.