Teams

Beerman - J. Borden

2023 Polk Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-23vs Polk/RegisterLost 12
W#1 DoublesJan Borden / Cynthia Nettles vs Susan White / Jane Phillips6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Spoto / Karen Hogg vs Joan Baldava / Kimberly Elmhorst4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAroma Taicher / Melissa Darch vs Carol Mullins / Lizette Murphy5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-09vs Winter Haven - J. PayneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Darch / Aroma Taicher vs Maria Ramka / Janet Platania6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Bateman / Kim Martin vs Judi Whitaker / Marcia Whitney2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Hogg / Catherine Mueller vs Kim Schmucker / Cindy Muir6-1, 6-1
2023-02-23vs Polk/RegisterLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Martin / Karen Bateman vs Carol Mullins / Joan Baldava5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Davis / Elizabeth Spoto vs Ellen Salm / Lisa Moseley5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Darch / Jan Borden vs Robin Sussingham / Jane Phillips6-3, 6-4
2023-02-16vs Winter Haven - J. PayneWon 21
L#1 DoublesJan Borden / Catherine Mueller vs Judi Whitaker / Maria Ramka4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKim Martin / Karen Bateman vs Kim Schmucker / Cindy Muir6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Davis / Elizabeth Spoto vs Marcia Whitney / Christina Beissinger6-3, 6-4
2023-02-02vs Polk/RegisterWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Spoto / Ginger Davis vs Joan Baldava / Dama Register6-4, 6-4
2023-01-26vs Winter Haven - J. PayneLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Bateman / Cynthia Nettles vs Marcia Whitney / Judi Whitaker6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Darch / Jan Borden vs Janet Platania / Maria Ramka5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKim Martin / Ginger Davis vs Margaret Huggins / Kim Schmucker6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jan Borden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Cynthia Nettles
published 3.5
3.06
Elizabeth Spoto
published 3.5
3.03
Melissa Darch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Ginger Davis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Karen Hogg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
Karen Bateman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Davis + Melissa Darch3451% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Davis + Karen Bateman2448% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Mueller + Karen Hogg2450% gamesnot enough data
Jan Borden + Melissa Darch3353% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Davis + Karen Hogg2345% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Darch + Karen Hogg224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Bateman + Catherine Mueller123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Bateman + Jan Borden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jan Borden
40W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Nettles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Elizabeth Spoto
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Melissa Darch
63W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Karen Bateman
39W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Catherine Mueller
26W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.