Teams

Wenzler/NLR/BP

2025 Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women (Local League at State)

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-09vs Ward/ArkadelphiaWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Hugen / Stephanie Petray vs B J Hampton / Paulette Overton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Carter / Kathy Mascuilli vs Susan Barron / Tracy Vickery6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesFelecia Knight / Dena Wenzler vs Vicki Levins / Patti Peeler6-1, 7-5
2025-11-08vs Venable/MH/TLTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Oulette / Stephanie Petray vs Toni Fisher / Carol Goldstein2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBelinda Brolo / Joan Khilling vs Nancy Decker / Phyllis Venable2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlysanne Crymes / Sarah Hugen vs Debbie Goolsby / Carolyn Kelley6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women (Local League at State) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Judy Nethercutt
published
3.26
Sarah Hugen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Belinda Brolo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Stephanie Petray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Kelly Oulette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Kathy Mascuilli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dena Wenzler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Alysanne Crymes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Joan Khilling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Felecia Knight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alysanne Crymes + Kathy Mascuilli033 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Petray + Kelly Oulette123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Nethercutt
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Sarah Hugen
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Belinda Brolo
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Stephanie Petray
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kelly Oulette
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Kathy Mascuilli
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Dena Wenzler
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Alysanne Crymes
9W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Joan Khilling
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Felecia Knight
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.