Teams

Holsinger, Jody

2023 Adult 40 & Over Daytime League 3.0 - 4.5 · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-14vs HOA/Norman/40&Over4.0WLost 13
W#1 DoublesKelly Eastwood / Brooke Indiveri vs Mary Nogalski / Chriss Shoup-Duntz1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSylvia Fendler vs Janice Redlingshafer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Moore / Meg Townsend vs Phyllis Norman / Sara Maguire6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRenee Steffes / Julie Kehrwald vs Melissa Foster / Laura Chisholm6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-03-03vs Vitha, DawnWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Eastwood / Mary Larson vs Lynn Sestak / Dawn Vitha4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRobin Yaple vs Natalie Austin7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJody Holsinger / Julie Kehrwald vs Erin Atherton / Sheila Jones6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTamara Hutcheson / Jill Ackerman vs Jennifer Schreiber / Carol Smith7-5, 6-1
2023-02-03vs Thompson, LisaWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Kehrwald / Sylvia Fendler vs Lori Stanziola / Becky Mehrmann6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKelly Eastwood vs Nancy Spielbusch6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Indiveri / Jill Ackerman vs Kyleen Fishwick / Stephanie Tapia-Gonzales6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Moore / Amy Stenslie vs Deb Danaher / Ruth Knox6-4, 6-4
2023-01-13vs Loyd, ShannaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSylvia Fendler / Julie Kehrwald vs Leigh O'Neal Wood / Carrie Lapin6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBrooke Indiveri vs Sarah Ross3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Moore / Tamara Hutcheson vs Maria Moore / Kristi LaMothe7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Eastwood / Amy Stenslie vs Kathleen Fendler / Micah Schloegel3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Larson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Amy Stenslie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Renee Steffes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Meg Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Jill Ackerman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Tamara Hutcheson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Kelly Eastwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Sylvia Fendler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Brooke Indiveri
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Stacey Moore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Robin Yaple
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Jody Holsinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Kehrwald
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marianne Jones
published
Robin Foderberg
published
Susan May
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marianne Jones + Mary Larson5162% games+11.4% vs expected
Jill Ackerman + Jody Holsinger7659% games+9.4% vs expected
Jody Holsinger + Julie Kehrwald7359% games+8.5% vs expected
Stacey Moore + Jody Holsinger13556% games+6.3% vs expected
Mary Larson + Meg Townsend13266% games+5.4% vs expected
Marianne Jones + Julie Kehrwald6257% games+2.6% vs expected
Kelly Eastwood + Sylvia Fendler9360% games+1.6% vs expected
Jody Holsinger + Sylvia Fendler3352% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Larson
79W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Stenslie
56W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
Renee Steffes
66W–52L career · 1 line in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Meg Townsend
129W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
Jill Ackerman
62W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tamara Hutcheson
41W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kelly Eastwood
61W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Sylvia Fendler
81W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Brooke Indiveri
85W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.39
Stacey Moore
75W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
Robin Yaple
22W–37L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.23
Jody Holsinger
86W–71L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.22
Julie Kehrwald
55W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Jones
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Mitchell Danciger
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Foderberg
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan May
27W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.