Teams

SD 3.5 SDT&RC(X:X)/ Adams

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5 WD

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-27vs SD 3.5 PBTC(2:2)/ LevineLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaige Hazard vs Victoria Pearce2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Savage / Paige Hazard vs Carol Morris / Suzanne VanSummern7-6, 6-1
2025-02-06vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC (3:1)/ WestLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Peinado / Elyse Wurster vs Alexandra Safa / Liza Tacher4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesIrene Coppedge / Katie Williams vs Katie Herrick / Elizabeth Dahlgren1-6, 3-6
2025-01-30vs SD 3.5 Mtn View(2:2)/ PadillaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Shirley / Paige Hazard vs Bea Vega / Yasuko Stanley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-23vs SD 3.5 La Jolla B&TC (2:2)/ YoungLost 02
L#2 DoublesSheryl Putnam / Diane Greenwood vs Amy Ragen / Kristen Patterson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesIrene Coppedge / Kate Gill vs Dawn Inglish / Sandy Callan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTracy Skaddan / Nancy Peinado vs Carisa Hackworth / Maricarmen Inchaurrandieta6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-09vs SD 3.5 LJTC(3:1)/ BrunoLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaige Hazard / Donna Fitzsimmons vs Sherrie Black / Paige Kratz6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Paige Hazard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.42
Lisa Shirley
published
3.29
Kelly Ann Tran
published
3.21
Kate Gill
published
3.12
3.11
Elyse Wurster
published
3.09
Tracy Skaddan
published
2.94
Sheryl Putnam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Diane Greenwood
published 3.5
2.79
Nancy Peinado
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.61
Irene Coppedge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Donna Fitzsimmons
published
Erin Smith
published
Nancy Stevens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Coppedge + Paige Hazard7644% games−0.7% vs expected
Irene Coppedge + Kate Gill134 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Skaddan + Sheryl Putnam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paige Hazard
89W–70L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Lisa Shirley
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kelly Ann Tran
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kate Gill
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Claudia Gallego Gutierrez
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Elyse Wurster
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Tracy Skaddan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Sheryl Putnam
56W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3.5
Diane Greenwood
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
3.5
Nancy Peinado
64W–95L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
3
Irene Coppedge
25W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
2.61
Donna Fitzsimmons
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Smith
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Stevens
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.