Teams

Justice/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-16vs Boyd/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJade Moss / Caroline Martin vs Lauren Cunningham / Rebecca Brower0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSusannah Mays vs Amy Smythe6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Justice / Rachel Veteto vs Amanda Whittington / Jessica Arth1-6, 1-6
2024-11-06vs Wehmeyer/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia McDonald / Susannah Mays vs Jodi Kendall / Sarah Richardson4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMeredith Brasfield vs Crista Mcmorran0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJade Moss / Caroline Martin vs Lisa Kimbrough / Brenda Kinney2-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs Boyd/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulia McDonald / Allison Cleeton vs Shannon Boyd / Sally Gillum2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Brasfield vs Blake Adams2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Justice / Lisa Berryhill vs Jessica Arth / Hart Kelman0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Caroline Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Susannah Mays
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.37
Laura Justice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Jade Moss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Danielle Montesi
published 2.5
2.19
Allison Cleeton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Rachel Veteto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Meredith Brasfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.00
Lisa Berryhill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Keating Lowery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Brasfield + Lisa Berryhill1535% games+3.8% vs expected
Jade Moss + Caroline Martin4352% games+2.2% vs expected
Meredith Brasfield + Rachel Veteto2340% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Berryhill + Laura Justice3248% gamesnot enough data
Rachel Veteto + Laura Justice123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Martin
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Susannah Mays
24W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.50
Laura Justice
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Jade Moss
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Danielle Montesi
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Allison Cleeton
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Rachel Veteto
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Meredith Brasfield
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Lisa Berryhill
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Keating Lowery
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.