Teams

BC-MCC/EricSmith

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-06vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/TonyHsuWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Simon Peters vs Kyle Vo / Francesco Nguyen1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-29vs BC-WestEnd/RogerKodaniWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Jason Manasse vs Philip Evatt / Tim Claar6-4, 7-5
2023-04-15vs BC-IndependencePark/NicholasAmbrosioSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Brown / Andrew Radden vs Mathew Gonzales / Eli Alejo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRemco Waller vs Jonathan Chen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-01vs BC-IndependencePark/RafaelHerrraSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Radden / Simon Peters vs German Pedraza / Mike Vieane6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRemco Waller / Edward Han vs Gary Gargantos / Richard Montano2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Landon Greene
published
4.62
Tim Crawmer
published 4.5
4.35
Simon Peters
published
4.30
Andrew Radden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Brent Buchsbaum
published 4.5
Abe Wong
published 4.5
4.24
Henry Coia
published 4.5
4.24
Jason Manasse
published
4.17
Ross Wooldridge
published
4.16
David Niehaus
published 4.5
3.95
Robbie Zimmerman
published
3.57
Matt Witherell
published
John J Cochran
published
John Ziegler
published
Remco Waller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Radden + Jason Manasse3343% games−7.6% vs expected
Andrew Radden + David Niehaus303 matchesnot enough data
Ross Wooldridge + Simon Peters213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Landon Greene
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
4.64
4.5
Tim Crawmer
26W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
4.62
Simon Peters
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Andrew Radden
67W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Brent Buchsbaum
2W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Abe Wong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Henry Coia
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Jason Manasse
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Ross Wooldridge
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
David Niehaus
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
Robbie Zimmerman
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
John J Cochran
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Ziegler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Remco Waller
35W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.