Teams

SFV - Smashing Sisters

2024 Adult 18+ Weekday SFV · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesStacy Ball vs Caroline Tran6-2, 6-4
2024-06-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Bodis / Pam Eyer vs Laury Wasoff / Donna Finkelstein4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Bodis / Stacy Ball vs Jenny Killgore / Laurie Ender6-1, 6-0
2024-05-28vs SFV - Volley VixensSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBeverly Wilkerson vs Frederique Salomon6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesVeronica Thorpe / Tracy Bodis vs Penny Oxciano / Cheryl Stolarski7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-05-21vs SFV - Slice GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Eyer / Beverly Wilkerson vs Kelly Fredrickson / Mina Yang3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGail Spear / Stacy Ball vs Michelle Tepper / Dayna Golenberg1-6, 4-6
2024-05-14vs SFV - StingersWon 20
W#1 SinglesBeverly Wilkerson vs Cindy Shih1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Coladonato / Tracy Bodis vs Kimberly Clayton / Nancy Perren6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStacy Ball vs Amy Randles5-7
2024-04-25vs SFV - Volley VixensWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracy Bodis / Cynthia Chan vs Linda Bryski / Angelina Smith0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStacy Ball vs Leith O'Leary6-3, 6-2
2024-04-16vs SFV - Slice GirlsLost 02
L#1 SinglesBeverly Wilkerson vs Michelle Tepper4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVeronica Thorpe / Tracy Bodis vs Allison Lambert / Sharon Bender7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.88
Martha Iveth Zarate
published
2.74
Tracy Bodis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Meegan Hamilton
published
2.69
Beverly Wilkerson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.66
Mary Coladonato
published
2.39
Renee Fields
published
2.37
Cynthia Chan
published 2.5
Pam Eyer
published
Season Skuro
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cholada Treepunprasert
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Martha Iveth Zarate
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Tracy Bodis
39W–76L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Meegan Hamilton
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Beverly Wilkerson
71W–109L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
Mary Coladonato
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
Renee Fields
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.39
2.5
Cynthia Chan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.37
Pam Eyer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Season Skuro
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.