Teams

Le Underground ATF

Fall Adult 18 & Over Fun Flex Doubles · Flex 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Flex 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Anna Winfield
published 3
2.84
Kristen Gilson
published
2.74
Graham Coskey
published 3
2.72
Emory Clark
published 3
2.50
Melissa Zinda
published
2.44
Tom Patton
published
Jack Zinda
published
MARK GILSON
published
Thomas Ware
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Winfield
104W–86L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kristen Gilson
55W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Graham Coskey
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Emory Clark
18W–32L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72
Melissa Zinda
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%49%51%
2.50
Tom Patton
23W–55L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Jack Zinda
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MARK GILSON
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Ware
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.