Teams

Yadkin/Burkhalter/40+3.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men Tuesday (night)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-22vs YAD/Montessi/40+ 3.5Lost 14
W#1 DoublesBrian Acker / Dean Burkhalter vs Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Jagdeep Singh6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTory Wagoner vs Carl Boggis0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Crews / Paul Howard vs James Richards / Joseph Potter5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Alvarez / Jeff Clay vs Chris Blankenship / Drew Gerstmyer6-7, 5-7
L#4 DoublesMichael Huggins / Ross Earle vs Steve Nagy / Daniel Johnson0-6, 1-6
2025-04-08vs YAD/Montessi/40+ 3.5Lost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Acker / Alex Djuro vs James Richards / Jagdeep Singh5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Alvarez / Matt Craver vs Andrew Backus / Daniel Johnson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTory Wagoner / Jeff Clay vs Carl Boggis / Chris Blankenship2-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesRoss Earle / David Draper vs Steve Nagy / Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan0-6, 1-6
2025-03-11vs YAD/Montessi/40+ 3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDean Burkhalter / Alex Djuro vs Steve Nagy / Chris Blankenship1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTory Wagoner / Ross Earle vs Daniel Hege / Jagdeep Singh0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Howard / David Draper vs Mark Johnson / Andrew Backus0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Tuesday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Jeff Clay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Brian Acker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Dean Burkhalter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Matt Craver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Matt Crews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Alex Djuro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Tory Wagoner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.08
Justin Hammonds
published
2.97
David Draper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Michael Huggins
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Ross Earle
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Acker + Matt Crews3251% gamesnot enough data
Matt Crews + Jeff Clay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Clay
37W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Brian Acker
18W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Dean Burkhalter
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Matt Craver
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Matt Crews
26W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alex Djuro
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Tory Wagoner
27W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Justin Hammonds
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
David Draper
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Michael Huggins
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ross Earle
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.