Teams

Stoneybrook Young

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 7.0 W Wednesday

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-02vs LBK Public GoodwinWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Young / Rena Whitaker vs Cynthia Strathmann / Gordon Debbie6-2, 6-4
2025-03-26vs LBK Public AssalyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRena Whitaker / Stephanie Young vs Diana Trivax Levy / Kori White6-4, 6-1
2025-03-12vs LWR SteffensWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Young / Rena Whitaker vs Claudia Kelly / Nancy Bartlett7-6, 6-2
2025-03-05vs LWR VavrekLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebbie French / Stephanie Young vs Linda Armiak / Jeanne Shklyar1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-19vs GT Bray PauleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie French / Stephanie Young vs JERI STEWART / Jackie Fox6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-05vs University Park GiaimoLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Young / Christina Seguin vs Linda Heitzner / Cecile Wooster3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Julie Deluca
published
3.38
Christina Seguin
published 3.5
3.29
Ellen Fussy
published 3.5
2.98
Stephanie Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Debbie French
published 3.5
2.91
Cynthia Mattingly
published 3.5
2.81
Andrea Anderson
published 3
2.63
Gretchen Goy
published 3
Jaymme Pederson
published
Karin Dayton
published
Rena Whitaker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Young + Rena Whitaker3447% gamesnot enough data
Gretchen Goy + Julie Deluca033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Deluca
65W–76L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Christina Seguin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Ellen Fussy
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Stephanie Young
123W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Debbie French
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3.5
Cynthia Mattingly
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Andrea Anderson
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Gretchen Goy
0W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jaymme Pederson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karin Dayton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rena Whitaker
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.