Teams

UPTA18A/Jackson/GCC

2025 UPTA Adult 18 & Over - USTA · 18+ Adult Women - 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-14vs UPTA18A/Cree/PavilionWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmanda Arscott / Carrie Ann Twedt vs Marnie Cree / Misela Garcia6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Philmon vs Andrea Scoggins6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLora Schipper / Courtney Worley vs Dorothy Farmer / Jane Argo1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKerry Ellett vs Alexandra Mendoza7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnastasia Siachos / Michele Wilson vs Tammy Rodgers / Dorelly Herford6-0, 6-4
2025-02-28vs UPTA18A/Dujardin/PavilionWon 32
W#1 DoublesTracy O'Shea / Natalie Brown vs Kathryn Means / Catherine Boetsch6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRae Gillespie vs Maria Batista0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Davis / Amanda Sanders vs Deb Dujardin / Dell Pulliam7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Philmon vs Simone Minnick6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRhonda Jackson / Maria Vogt vs Laura Fee / Laura North7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Amanda Arscott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Carissa Ivey
published 3.5
3.28
Elizabeth Philmon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Amanda Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anastasia Siachos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Courtney Worley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Carrie Ann Twedt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Carol Farnsworth
published 3.5
3.16
Courtney Couchell
published 3.5
3.15
Diana Tiller
published 3.5
3.13
M Christine von Wyl
published
3.09
Margaret Boliek
published
3.09
Natalie Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jillian Holmes
published
2.98
Tracy O'Shea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Lora Schipper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Culumovic
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kerry Ellett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Maria Vogt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Holekamp
published
Rae Gillespie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy O'Shea + Carrie Ann Twedt4159% games+8.2% vs expected
Carissa Ivey + Diana Tiller4256% games+3.9% vs expected
Tracy O'Shea + Natalie Brown5247% games+3.2% vs expected
Tracy O'Shea + M Christine von Wyl314 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Arscott + M Christine von Wyl303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Arscott
10W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Carissa Ivey
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Elizabeth Philmon
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Amanda Sanders
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Anastasia Siachos
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Courtney Worley
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Ann Twedt
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carol Farnsworth
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Courtney Couchell
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Diana Tiller
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
M Christine von Wyl
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Margaret Boliek
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Natalie Brown
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Jillian Holmes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tracy O'Shea
39W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Lora Schipper
3W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Katie Culumovic
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerry Ellett
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Maria Vogt
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Megan Holekamp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rae Gillespie
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.