Teams

CTL55/Pool/CTC

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-11vs CTL55/Martin/RKWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Kreese / Michael Beam vs Keith Axson / Trey Spong3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Richard Grich / Michael Tyler6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSrihari Nelakuditi / Kemper Amick vs James Younts / Sam Holland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs CTL (A) 3.5M 55 & Over (Clements)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Beam / DWIGHT SAWYER vs Ed Byrd / Tom Tracy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Kreese / Srihari Nelakuditi vs Avula Mallikarjuna / William Jordan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Pool / Robert Dozier vs Gerard Erley / Henry Miller6-3, 6-0
2026-03-21vs CTL55/Imholz/CSPWon 20
W#1 DoublesSrihari Nelakuditi / Kemper Amick vs Elliott Johnson / Stuart Murray6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Andrew Hemingway / Michael Switzer6-0, 6-2
2026-03-14vs CTL55/Gendreau/WWDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Beam / DWIGHT SAWYER vs Steven Junis / Will Kuhne7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Ron Gendreau / Steve Francis5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKemper Amick / George Kreese vs Thomas Dougall / Lentz Ivey6-3, 6-1
2026-03-07vs CTL55/Zobrist/TCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeorge Kreese / Srihari Nelakuditi vs Stephen Shaffer / Tod Graham6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Tim Webb / Roy Cummings6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKemper Amick / DWIGHT SAWYER vs Benton Young / Eddie Talley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-28vs CTL55/Henry/WRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Jim Powell / Dennis Malatek6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSrihari Nelakuditi / George Kreese vs Kenneth Henry / Mark Lybrand6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-21vs CTL55/Martin/RKWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Mark Ferguson / Philip Willis6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSrihari Nelakuditi / Kemper Amick vs Edwin Martin Jr / Sam Holland4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoseph Campbell / George Kreese vs Keith Axson / James Younts4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-07vs CTL55/Gendreau/WWDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Beam / DWIGHT SAWYER vs Patrick Layden / Thomas Dougall4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Brian Pool vs Steve Francis / Lentz Ivey6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSrihari Nelakuditi / George Kreese vs Steven Junis / Bert Hutchinson7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Brian Pool
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Kemper Amick
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
James Turner
published
3.27
Srihari Nelakuditi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.25
George Kreese
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.23
Robert Dozier
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Michael Beam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Joseph Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
DWIGHT SAWYER
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.01
David Ford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Scott Prince
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Srihari Nelakuditi + Brian Pool9264% games+15.1% vs expected
Brian Pool + Robert Dozier22172% games+10.7% vs expected
David Ford + Brian Pool16262% games+8.5% vs expected
George Kreese + Srihari Nelakuditi314 matchesnot enough data
David Ford + Joseph Campbell044 matchesnot enough data
Michael Beam + DWIGHT SAWYER033 matchesnot enough data
Kemper Amick + DWIGHT SAWYER123 matchesnot enough data
Kemper Amick + Srihari Nelakuditi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Pool
124W–63L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kemper Amick
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
James Turner
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Srihari Nelakuditi
79W–63L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
George Kreese
35W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
Robert Dozier
73W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Michael Beam
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Joseph Campbell
44W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3
DWIGHT SAWYER
61W–34L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
David Ford
82W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Scott Prince
26W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.