Teams

2025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL Western Verbauwhede

2025 WI Combo Mixed · WI Combo Mixed 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.69 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesZach Janssen / Chelsea Watry vs Ethan Hoag / Sue Roberts6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJordan Verbauwhede / Andrea Agen vs Tom Leggett / Natalie Brandt6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDave Andersen / Maureen Burke vs Erica Shookman / David Wiesner7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesPatricia Lison-Sheikh / Andrew Terry vs Nathan Barash / Emily Wick6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacques Verbauwhede / Christy Policy vs Tom Leggett / Abbey Grunwald6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Wickman / Maureen Burke vs Sue Roberts / David Wiesner6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesChelsea Watry / Zach Janssen vs Gary Congdon / Michele O Donnell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDaniel Wickman / Tara Sherman vs Karlyn Jakusz / Ken Wilcox6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAllyson Verbauwhede / Glen Sherman vs William Hlavac / Kari Worzella7-5, 6-1
W#1 DoublesZach Janssen / Chelsea Watry vs Ken Wilcox / Karlyn Jakusz6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJacques Verbauwhede / Tara Sherman vs Michele O Donnell / Gary Congdon6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllyson Verbauwhede / Glen Sherman vs William Hlavac / Kari Worzella6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDonn Johnson / Susan Lin vs Ann Franz / Brian Larson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Lison-Sheikh / Andrew Terry vs Richard Gerstein / Emily Holland7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDave Andersen / Christy Policy vs Sheri Brannen / Duane Brandt5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesDaniel Wickman / Christy Policy vs Amy Buege / Richard Gerstein6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Agen / Jordan Verbauwhede vs Brian Larson / Sheri Brannen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Lin / Donn Johnson vs Russell Salzer / Emily Holland6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WI Combo Mixed 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL Western Verbauwhede601538130
22025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL Western Jonen3310820169
32025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL Oshkosh Hammond2481022167
42025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL travel Jakusz1531530191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Jordan Verbauwhede
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Allyson Verbauwhede
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Patricia Lison-Sheikh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Daniel Wickman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Jacques Verbauwhede
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Dave Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Tara Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Andrew Terry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Christy Policy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Chelsea Watry
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.16
Maureen Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Andrea Agen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Glen Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Donn Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Lin
published
Zach Janssen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacques Verbauwhede + Andrea Agen5259% games+11.8% vs expected
Andrew Terry + Tara Sherman6354% games+9.6% vs expected
Jacques Verbauwhede + Chelsea Watry5455% gamesnot enough data
Tara Sherman + Glen Sherman4445% gamesnot enough data
Tara Sherman + Zach Janssen303 matchesnot enough data
Zach Janssen + Chelsea Watry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Verbauwhede
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
4.5
Allyson Verbauwhede
62W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Patricia Lison-Sheikh
187W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Daniel Wickman
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Jacques Verbauwhede
69W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Dave Andersen
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Sherman
99W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Andrew Terry
56W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Christy Policy
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Chelsea Watry
77W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Maureen Burke
37W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Andrea Agen
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Glen Sherman
36W–58L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Donn Johnson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Lin
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zach Janssen
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.