Teams

JTC - Fuller/Thiebault

2021 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesPeggi Bockman / Vinata Vedam-Mai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-12-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Magee / Alison Andrus vs Haile Ratliff / Aubrey Hall4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-11-21vs WS - McLaughlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Magee / Peggi Bockman vs Lindsey Wilson / Anchalee Phataralaoha6-1, 6-0
2021-11-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlison Andrus / Kim Magee vs Haile Ratliff / Anna Ligman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-31vs WS - McLaughlinLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Magee / Alison Andrus vs Courtney Woody / Jigisha Shah6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKannika Torres / Taiana Mendez vs Ali Messenger / Aurymar Rodriguez2-6, 3-6
2021-10-24vs DB - EdelsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Andrus / Kristina Ford vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Shannon Reintgen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-15vs Alachua - DB/GilsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlison Andrus / Kannika Torres vs Susie Finfrock / Dawn Dean4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Alison Andrus
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
Cynthia Thibault
published 4
3.54
Taiana Mendez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.46
Allison Shinn
published 4
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
3.25
Gina Dell
published 3.5
3.20
Vinata Vedam-Mai
published
Maria Curatolo
published
Peggi Bockman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Andrus + Kim Magee1537% games−8.6% vs expected
Peggi Bockman + Alison Andrus4352% gamesnot enough data
Peggi Bockman + Taiana Mendez5064% gamesnot enough data
Taiana Mendez + Alison Andrus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Cynthia Thibault
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Taiana Mendez
23W–37L career · 1 line in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Allison Shinn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Gina Dell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Vinata Vedam-Mai
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Maria Curatolo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggi Bockman
30W–28L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.