Teams

Carey-Lobs of Fun 65+ 7.0

2025 Howard Adult 65 & Over · Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-01vs Jordan 65+ 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Carey / Susan Baxter vs Jean Flack / Pamela Leffler3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEllen Prucha / Valerie Mockapetris vs Cynthia Keenan / Terri Mrozinski1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesNancy Carey / Valerie Mockapetris vs Emily Frank / Sharon Tennyson2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMarie Kerins / Susan Baxter vs Debra MacDonald / Betsy Campochiaro6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Carole Shapiro vs Manette Zinkand / Connie Bird7-6, 6-6
W#1 DoublesNancy Carey / Ellen Prucha vs Angela Parker / Betsy Campochiaro6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Trimble / Debby Moulding vs Thelma Leitzer-Kerr / Linda Deanto4-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs Jordan 65+ 7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesTherese Erdman / Melissa Hook vs Deborah Dettmer / Jane Long6-3, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMarie Kerins / Valerie Mockapetris vs Terri Mrozinski / Linda Webb6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebby Moulding / Nancy Trimble vs Michele Jordan / Debbie Drown6-1, 7-5
2025-06-12vs Jordan 65+ 7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesValerie Mockapetris / Nancy Trimble vs Deborah Dettmer / Pamela Leffler4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Carey / Ellen Prucha vs Terri Mrozinski / Rosemary Prola4-6, 6-6
L#3 DoublesDebby Moulding / Carole Shapiro vs Doris Zingman / Susan Dolinka4-6, 4-6
2025-06-11vs Jordan 65+ 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Carey / Valerie Mockapetris vs Jane Long / Deborah Wright4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebby Moulding / Ellen Prucha vs Susan Dolinka / Rosemary Prola4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSusan Baxter / Marie Kerins vs Angela Parker / Betsy Campochiaro3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Carey / Therese Erdman vs Joy Kirk / Connie Bird4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesValerie Mockapetris / Ellen Prucha vs Donna Slaughter / Lama Shikani6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesValerie Mockapetris / Nancy Trimble vs Emily Frank / Sharon Tennyson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Kerins / Susan Baxter vs Joy Kirk / Thelma Leitzer-Kerr6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Reichard / Nancy Carey vs Angela Parker / Connie Bird0-6, 0-6
2025-05-22vs Jordan 65+ 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Trimble / Valerie Mockapetris vs Diana Engler / Jane Long6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Carey / Therese Erdman vs Deborah Dettmer / Pamela Leffler7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Reichard / Marie Kerins vs Leanne Paranik / Linda Deanto3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarole Shapiro / Debby Moulding vs Joy Kirk / Thelma Leitzer-Kerr4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Carey / Susan Baxter vs Debra MacDonald / Teresa Adams3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Marie Kerins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Valerie Mockapetris
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Ellen Prucha
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Therese Erdman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Nancy Carey
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Nancy Trimble
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.62
Debby Moulding
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Melissa Hook
published
Susan Baxter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Carey + Valerie Mockapetris4647% games+4.9% vs expected
Nancy Trimble + Valerie Mockapetris4846% gamesnot enough data
Marie Kerins + Therese Erdman3552% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Trimble + Debby Moulding2444% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Carey + Ellen Prucha134 matchesnot enough data
Therese Erdman + Nancy Carey123 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Prucha + Valerie Mockapetris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marie Kerins
43W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Valerie Mockapetris
129W–104L career · 8 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Ellen Prucha
23W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Therese Erdman
55W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Nancy Carey
120W–229L career · 9 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Debby Moulding
46W–70L career · 9 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Melissa Hook
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Baxter
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.