Teams

PENINSULA CC 40AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Privina Sexton
published
3.67
Melissa Rhen
published
3.65
Joces Lyons
published
3.62
Jennifer Skarakis
published
3.44
Fay Toolami
published
3.38
Sherri Glenn
published
3.34
Lora Saarnio
published
3.33
Gail Fong
published
3.29
Marla Lindsay
published
3.28
Terry Romero
published
3.28
Melissa Weiss
published
3.26
Tonya Vincent
published
Anne Pert
published 3.5
3.21
Khin Tint
published
3.15
Amy Clifford
published 3.5
3.14
Deborah Zeitschel
published 3.5
3.10
Melodie Rubin
published
2.97
Akiko Lip
published 3.5
2.72
Laura Sorenson
published
Karen Morrill
published
Kimberley Gaumer
published
Laurel Dawson
published
Robin Tognetti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Clifford + Deborah Zeitschel5649% games+1.7% vs expected
Sherri Glenn + Tonya Vincent5451% games+1.4% vs expected
Terry Romero + Sherri Glenn2349% gamesnot enough data
Terry Romero + Tonya Vincent134 matchesnot enough data
Marla Lindsay + Amy Clifford303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Privina Sexton
40W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.85
Melissa Rhen
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Joces Lyons
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Jennifer Skarakis
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Fay Toolami
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
Sherri Glenn
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Lora Saarnio
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Claudia Dotson San Vicente
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Marla Lindsay
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Terry Romero
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Melissa Weiss
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Tonya Vincent
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Anne Pert
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Khin Tint
40W–42L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Amy Clifford
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Zeitschel
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Melodie Rubin
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Akiko Lip
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Laura Sorenson
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.72
Karen Morrill
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberley Gaumer
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurel Dawson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Tognetti
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.