Teams

Apex:KBK:Cassidy

2024 ME Fall Tri Level · Women's 3.5 South

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-07vs Apex:FiorentinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Cassidy / Angela Carter vs Martha Long / Carol Lambert2-6, 5-7
2024-11-17vs Apex:TripleTheFun:HollandWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cassidy / Angela Carter vs Erin Whipple / Kimberly Kelly-Brewster2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-20vs Apex:4StringsAttached:ScottWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cassidy / Kathryn Brown vs Sarah Scott / Pamela Elwell6-2, 6-4
2024-10-20vs Apex:FiorentinoWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cassidy / Kathy Brown vs Anna Fiorentino / Chelsie Woods6-4, 7-6
2024-10-05vs Apex:TripleTheFun:HollandWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cassidy / Angela Carter vs Sarah Holland / Erin Whipple6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women's 3.5 South
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FF:TenaciousT:Eberhardt6262555
2Apex:KBK:Cassidy6262778
3Apex:Fiorentino4444876
4Apex:4StringsAttached:Scott35351191
5Apex:TripleTheFun:Holland17171491

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Angela Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Barbara Cassidy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kathryn Brown
published
Kathy Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Brown + Kathryn Brown314 matchesnot enough data
Angela Carter + Barbara Cassidy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Carter
88W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Barbara Cassidy
53W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Brown
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathy Brown
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.