Teams

ACAC Lockhart

2023 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-31vs HCC HarcumSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Kathryn Napier vs Jennifer Gnapp / Debra Suyama6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJanice Whitaker / Karen Zachary vs Heidi Hall / Karen Rascoe6-7, 3-6
2023-07-28vs Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Susan Lockhart vs Mona Stahling / Lisa Penny3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-10vs Raintree CooperWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Lockhart / Kimberly Giancaspro vs Corrine Cooper / Shannon Webb7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs SCC LaneLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Zachary / Janice Whitaker vs Karen Riley / Susan Gregory0-6, 2-6
2023-06-19vs Stonehenge SnavelyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanice Whitaker / Karen Zachary vs Betsy Goodreau / Emby Staub6-1, 6-4
2023-06-12vs Westwood TowlerLost 01
L#3 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Monte Shorte vs Annette King / Sheryl Highfill6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2023-06-05vs ACAC NeumannLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Giancaspro / Susan Lockhart vs Judy Duke / Carol Hoefer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Karen Zachary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Eileen Cerny
published
3.29
Kimberly Giancaspro
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Betsy Civilette
published 3.5
3.19
Rhysa South
published
3.16
Linda Wood
published
3.15
Susan Lockhart
published
3.04
Maureen Sisti
published
Janice Whitaker
published
Monte Shorte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Zachary + Kimberly Giancaspro3446% gamesnot enough data
Rhysa South + Susan Lockhart4254% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Sisti + Karen Zachary123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Zachary
52W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Eileen Cerny
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Kimberly Giancaspro
89W–100L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Betsy Civilette
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Rhysa South
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Linda Wood
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Susan Lockhart
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Maureen Sisti
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Janice Whitaker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monte Shorte
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.