Teams

3BLOOM-LAI Team Singles 4.5+ Men SEM

2023 SEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2023 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM

5 players · average NTRP 4.38 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 SinglesRohit Srinath vs John Hughes6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Trenton Townsend5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Jeff Oparka2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesInbum Song vs Narihiro Agusa2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRohit Srinath vs Nichola Stojanov4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesErik Kafarski vs Noah Gedrimas6-7, 2-6
2023-03-05vs 4EAST-KEAN Team Singles 4.5+ Men SEMSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRohit Srinath vs Jose Benavente7-6, 4-2
L#2 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Marlon Leone5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Cheng Gong6-7, 2-2
L#2 SinglesErik Kafarski vs Jonathan Martin3-6, 0-3
L#1 SinglesInbum Song vs John Spina1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesInbum Song vs Jonathan Martin3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesErik Kafarski vs Cheng Gong2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Narihiro Agusa6-3, 4-4
L#1 SinglesInbum Song vs Noah Gedrimas1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrendan Childress vs John Hughes4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesErik Kafarski vs Trenton Townsend7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2023 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14EAST-KEAN Team Singles 4.5+ Men SEM63171023211
21SCWB-KUROSAWA Team Singles 4.5+ Men SEM63151224218
32DEER-TOWNSEND Team Singles 4.5+ Men SEM45141332264
43BLOOM-LAI Team Singles 4.5+ Men SEM2781940286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Lai
published 4.5
4.24
Brendan Childress
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.86
Inbum Song
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Erik Kafarski
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
Rohit Srinath
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brendan Childress + David Lai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Lai
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brendan Childress
46W–72L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Inbum Song
18W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Erik Kafarski
16W–19L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rohit Srinath
58W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.