Teams

Br.Eckles18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-26vs Ma.Hanauer18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Brett Compton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-19vs Ma.Hanauer18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Brett Compton6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKwame Owens vs Rawle Sue-Ho6-1, 6-1
2025-07-19vs De.Farmer18S4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Eric Roller6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKwame Owens vs Jackson Bowen6-2, 6-2
2025-07-12vs Br.Aron18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Matthew Glenn6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Bradford Aron6-1, 6-0
2025-06-28vs De.Farmer18S4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Jason Coble6-1, 6-1
2025-06-21vs Br.Aron18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Matthew Tomayko6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs James Miron7-6, 6-0
2025-06-21vs Ma.Hanauer18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesNodirbek Korchiev vs Daniel Gallo6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKwame Owens vs Brett Compton6-2, 6-1
2025-06-07vs De.Farmer18S4.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Evan Wharton6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Eric Roller6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Dempsey Farmer5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-31vs Br.Aron18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs James Miron6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs Bradford Aron6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Juan Manrique Romero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.55
Herman Gudjonson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.43
Kwame Owens
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 5
4.42
Nodirbek Korchiev
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Brett Eckles
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Kwame Owens5165% games+13.5% vs expected
Brett Eckles + Herman Gudjonson6262% games+2.3% vs expected
Kwame Owens + Juan Manrique Romero123 matchesnot enough data
Kwame Owens + Herman Gudjonson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Juan Manrique Romero
35W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.74
4.5
Herman Gudjonson
115W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.55
5
Kwame Owens
168W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
4.43
4.5
Nodirbek Korchiev
38W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.