Teams

C3 Acac Davis CC Crushers

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-19vs C5 Woodlake RitterLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Aaron / Bert Teachey vs Ana Adkins / Wieslaw Gumulak4-6, 0-6
2022-11-13vs C6 Belmont Ballistic ArnoldLost 02
L#1 DoublesBert Teachey / Erika Anderson vs Ty Levy / Rebecca Seidel0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTracey Watson / Ken Hatcher vs Lee Wilson / Rebecca Morgan1-6, 2-6
2022-11-06vs C4 Willow Oaks BlackwoodLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatt Pepple / Natalie Lewis vs Terence Blackwood / Jenny Morris5-7, 3-6
2022-10-30vs C7 CCV ReifsniderLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephen Chandler / Natalie Lewis vs Anne Henry / Michael Bor2-6, 2-6
2022-10-29vs C2 Westwood CecilLost 01
L#3 DoublesTracey Watson / Ken Hatcher vs Emily Dunstan / Grant Slegowski1-6, 1-6
2022-10-23vs C9 Return of the MAC HuangLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Adams / Tracey Watson vs Allen Huang / Mary Church6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBert Teachey / Erika Anderson vs Jimmy Qing / Therese Jones1-6, 3-6
2022-10-09vs C5 Woodlake RitterLost 01
L#2 DoublesErika Anderson / Bert Teachey vs Peter Schneeberger / Mary Estes3-6, 4-6
2022-09-17vs C1 Raintree CharyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracey Watson / Jason Ruth vs Madhav Kidambi / Jennifer Morris6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kristen Walton
published
3.72
Bert Teachey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Tracey Watson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Steve Leighty
published
3.31
Ken Hatcher
published
3.26
Stephen Chandler
published
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.10
Natalie Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Kimberly Williams
published
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Matt Pepple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Davis + Ken Hatcher303 matchesnot enough data
Jean Davis + Steve Leighty213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Walton
35W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Bert Teachey
119W–144L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Tracey Watson
135W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
Steve Leighty
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Ken Hatcher
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
Stephen Chandler
24W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–128L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Williams
17W–6L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Pepple
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.