Teams

AMcCurry/LPorcher (Carmel)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-25vs JJZhu/ZMarenic (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Diman / Debbie Porter vs JJ Zhu / Zahide Marenic6-2, 6-4
2024-09-04vs RJampani (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Beebe / Laurie Diman vs Melanie Cox / Shikha Agrawal6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Laurie Diman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.75
Christina Murphy
published 3
2.75
Casey Fuller
published 3
2.74
Ashley Kreth
published 3
2.74
Julie Clements
published
2.63
Lisa Beebe
published
2.44
Courtney Jackson
published 2.5
2.41
Debbie Porter
published 3
2.29
Julia Tripodes
published
2.16
Anne McCurry
published 2.5
2.07
Leigh Porcher
published
Lana Cummings
published
Margaret Janovsky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Fuller + Debbie Porter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laurie Diman
122W–83L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Christina Murphy
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Casey Fuller
14W–26L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ashley Kreth
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Julie Clements
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Lisa Beebe
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Courtney Jackson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%68%32%
2.44
3
Debbie Porter
9W–25L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.41
Julia Tripodes
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.29
2.5
Anne McCurry
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Leigh Porcher
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Lana Cummings
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Janovsky
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.