Teams

1-JByrd-Eno-4.5

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men-Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-18vs 4-TSoddy-DFCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Jackson Naftel vs Edward Anderson / Jeff Francki6-2, 0-2
2022-05-10vs 3-JPelphrey-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Julien de la Mettrie vs Alexander Leopold / Jake Wolfe4-6, 5-7
2022-04-28vs 2-CVinson-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Faltz / Julien de la Mettrie vs Erik J Erikson / Richard Papantonis2-6, 4-6
2022-04-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Bill Bobbitt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-07vs 3-JPelphrey-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / George E Moseley vs Kyle Couch / Laurence Isaacs6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCasey Black / Jackson Naftel vs Tyler Carroll / Alan Faulkner7-5, 6-3
2022-03-28vs 2-CVinson-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Beomjun Ju vs Jason Abhau / Jonathan Hodges7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulien de la Mettrie / Steve Faltz vs Richard McClenny / Drew Slocum6-2, 6-0
2022-03-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Belonga / Jermaine Byrd vs Benjamin Albright / Jimmy Epps7-6, 7-5
2022-03-17vs 4-TSoddy-DFCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Julien de la Mettrie vs Seth Layton / Calvin Brown6-0, 6-0
2022-03-03vs 2-CVinson-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesTyler Newman / Jackson Naftel vs Erik J Erikson / Jonathan Hodges3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Julien de la Mettrie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.60
Ravi Tewari
published
4.45
Andrew Belonga
published 4.5
4.39
Geoffrey Vollman
published 4.5
4.27
William Sendor
published
Henry Kennelly
published 4.5
4.21
Casey Black
published 4.5
4.20
Jackson Naftel
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.13
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
Steve Faltz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jermaine Byrd + Julien de la Mettrie4181% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Julien de la Mettrie
77W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.80
Ravi Tewari
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.60
4.5
Andrew Belonga
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Geoffrey Vollman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
4.39
William Sendor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Henry Kennelly
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Casey Black
24W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Jackson Naftel
67W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 9 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
Steve Faltz
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.