Teams

ALMADEN VAC 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Monika Miles
published
3.21
Sheba Naderzad
published
3.16
Chihiro Tajima
published 3.5
3.12
Mona Lee
published
3.05
Katherine Dean
published
3.00
Ann Kerdchonphet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Chengyu Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Andrea Sargis
published 3
2.85
Jule Flores
published
2.81
Veena McDiarmid
published
2.78
Ivetta Bagirov
published 3
2.77
Geumyeon Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Michelle Sarmenta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Esperanza McConn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Cathy Waheed
published 3
1.90
Suzanne Yost
published
Xinmeng Qiao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veena McDiarmid + Katherine Dean3260% games+8.6% vs expected
Mona Lee + Monika Miles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monika Miles
30W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Sheba Naderzad
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Chihiro Tajima
4W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Mona Lee
29W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
Katherine Dean
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Ann Kerdchonphet
35W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.00
3
Chengyu Chen
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Andrea Sargis
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Jule Flores
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Veena McDiarmid
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Ivetta Bagirov
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Geumyeon Park
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Michelle Sarmenta
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Esperanza McConn
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Cathy Waheed
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.57
Suzanne Yost
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Xinmeng Qiao
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.