Teams

El.Hamilton18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-11vs Er.McAllister18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKimberly Patrey vs Nikki DAmbrose2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJane Williams vs McKenzie Keenan Osman6-1, 6-4
2025-07-10vs Me.Golder18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Meryl Golder3-6, 3-6
2025-07-01vs Li.Murdock18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Julie Cronin6-4, 6-2
2025-06-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKimberly Patrey vs Christine Letcher3-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Me.Golder18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Maya Hahn6-2, 7-6
2025-06-02vs Er.McAllister18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKimberly Patrey vs McKenzie Keenan Osman0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesJane Williams vs Laura Rendon6-2, 7-6
2025-05-22vs Li.Murdock18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesJane Williams vs Sapna Varkey4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Skylar Poole
published
4.00
Smita Paranjape
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Carolyn Lee
published 4
Erika Grenier
published 4
3.71
Jane Williams
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Elise Hamilton
published 3.5
3.60
Kimberly Patrey
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.50
Amanda Lindsay
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Patrey + Jane Williams151350% games−2.4% vs expected
Amanda Lindsay + Skylar Poole303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Skylar Poole
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.01
4.5
Smita Paranjape
82W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Carolyn Lee
35W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Erika Grenier
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jane Williams
309W–299L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Elise Hamilton
38W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
4
Kimberly Patrey
238W–186L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Amanda Lindsay
35W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.